Three western U.S. states propose additional water cuts

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 21, 2024

The Lower Basin states of California, Arizona and Nevada and the Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming reached an agreement last year that takes them through the end of 2026. They now are tasked with reaching a long-term agreement of at least 20 years that must meet the challenge of more extreme droughts expected with climate change. | Screencap via ucrcommission.com

REUTERS — California, Arizona and Nevada have offered what they described as significant concessions on how much Colorado River water they claim as their counterparts nearer the river’s source proposed more modest changes that would protect their rights.

The dual proposals renew longstanding tensions between the two groups of states within the Colorado River Compact, the century-old framework for sharing the vital source of irrigation for arid western farmland and drinking water for 40 million people.

The Lower Basin states of California, Arizona and Nevada and the Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming reached an agreement last year that takes them through the end of 2026. They now are tasked with reaching a long-term agreement of at least 20 years that must meet the challenge of more extreme droughts expected with climate change.

Read Also

A colour-coded map of Canada showing the various plant hardiness zones.

Canada’s plant hardiness zones receive update

The latest update to Canada’s plant hardiness zones and plant hardiness maps was released this summer.

“Ultimately this will get resolved but not without some elbows and shoving,” said Brad Udall, a climate scientist at Colorado State University.

Recognizing complaints that the Upper Basin was required to surrender too much water, the Lower Basin states agreed to reduce their allotments by 1.5 million acre-feet per year, roughly the amount consumed by three million households, said Arizona Department of Water Resources director Tom Buschatzke.

Depending on reservoir levels, that could still leave a system-wide deficit of 2.4 million acre-feet, for which the Lower Basin proposed that each side share equally in assuming reductions, Buschatzke said.

“We recognize the condition that the reservoirs are in, we recognize what climate change is doing to the flow of the river,” Buschatzke said.

“And we’re stepping up to the plate in a big way to deal with that issue. And we expect Upper Basin to participate with us in stepping up to the plate.”

Chuck Cullom, executive director of the Upper Colorado River Commission, said his side’s proposal reflects the disadvantage the Upper Basin faces because it depends more on snowpack, which is volatile.

Lower Basin states can more easily adapt to changing conditions because of the more predictable reserves in Lake Mead, the reservoir formed by the Hoover Dam.

“Our water users have lived on the front lines of climate change for decades,” Cullom said.

“The (Upper Basin) alternative provides an opportunity for our Lower Basin partners to begin sharing that burden.”

explore

Stories from our other publications