I am writing in response to Betty Coulthard’s response to criticism in the Oct. 28 issue. First I would like to apologize for any threats she may have received. I do not condone that type of activity.
Betty asks us to learn reading comprehension. One might ask Betty to take her own advice.
The major argument against horse slaughter by most opponents is not just the fact that we believe it is cruel and inhumane in its application, but that it is used as an outlet for breeders to dispose of horses that do not measure up or cannot be sold.
Read Also
Canola council cuts field agronomy team
The Canola Council of Canada is cutting its agronomy team as part of a “refreshed strategic framework.”
Betty substantiates that argument with her statement that 30,000 Thoroughbreds are born each year and the Kentucky Derby has a 20 horse gate. What do you think happens to the majority of those foals? They are sent to slaughter. …
So, Betty, you were correct when you stated that it takes 100 horses to get two good ones. The reader’s comprehension of the slaughter situation is accurate and that is why we object to its senseless cruelty.
And please stop using the “hungry people” argument. We all know this meat is not necessary to feed anyone. It is not for the poor but brings a very good price per pound. The poor cannot afford horse meat.
The two major industries supplying the slaughter houses are Thoroughbreds and Quarter horses. These horses are not raised for the love of horses. They are raised for the ego of the owners and for profit.
The horses are a commodity to most of these breeders and in my opinion, Betty, you are among that group. I personally find it insulting that you keep saying you love your horses. You love the industry, not the individual animals, and you proved that when you sent them to slaughter.
In the original article, Betty said that she had offered 60 horses in their sale and ended up shipping 25 young horses and then states in the Oct. 28, article that she shipped 18. Typo?
I am also confused as to what Betty’s health and accident have to do with anything.
I agree it is unfortunate that she had a bad week and had to take some painkillers.
However, Betty and her husband are still alive. Her horses paid for Betty’s bad week with their lives.
Theresa Nolet,
Penticton, B.C.
