Research hike doesn’t follow levy

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: January 23, 2003

After convincing growers to pay higher levies to fund research, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers is devoting a smaller proportion of check-off dollars on research in the current fiscal year.

Since 1984, the grower group has spent 67 percent of farmers’ money on research and development.

In 2002-03, it plans to devote 53 percent of the available checkoff.

While the $1.66 million will be a record in terms of sheer dollar amount, it represents a 14 percentage point decline in historical research commitment.

That weakening of support has some farmers feeling they’ve been sold a bill of goods, while others are not bothered.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

Directors and executives of Saskatchewan Pulse Growers spent a good part of last year telling farmers the levy hike was necessary because there was a $20 million annual shortfall in pulse research funding. That message was repeated in the group’s Pulsepoint magazine and at numerous grower group meetings.

It worked.

Seventy percent of producers who attended 11 regional winter meetings and nine town hall meetings voted in favour of increasing the levy to meet the growing research needs.

Accordingly, on Aug. 1, 2002, the checkoff rose from 0.5 percent to 0.75 percent. It will cap out at one percent on Aug. 1, 2003.

Later, a resolution to change the checkoff to a voluntary levy was defeated at the association’s annual general meeting.

But some levy payers like Vaughn Crone of Moose Jaw, Sask., feel betrayed that the proportion of check-off money going to research is below the historical

average.

He said it shows there are no controls on the way the board spends its money.

“They could take that money and send it to the Pope and we wouldn’t have a say,” said Crone, an opponent of increasing the levy.

Other farmers say they are not upset with how the board is allocating its funds. They are satisfied with executive director Garth Patterson’s explanation that the market development and communication budgets require more money these days.

Farmer Lorne Willner of Davidson, Sask., said administration costs are probably rising as well.

“Unfortunately that’s just part of life I guess, that bureaucracy or administration continues to eat up a larger chunk of everything nowadays. Salaries go up, office expenses go up.”

Gerald Leduc, a seed grower from Assiniboia, Sask., thinks it may take time to increase research spending, this being the first year of higher checkoffs.

“It probably takes a little while to ramp up the research, to get the researchers in place.”

Patterson said the board directed more money to research in the early days of the association because there weren’t as many competing spending priorities.

“There have certainly been issues in the areas of market development and communications where we’ve needed to invest funds.”

He said spending plans fluctuate from year-to-year. But the $1.66 million for research is still more than has ever been spent and represents more than half of the 2002-03 budget.

The plan is to increase research spending to $4 million by 2005.

“That’s probably going to take us up pretty close into that 60 percent range again,” said Patterson.

About the author

Sean Pratt

Sean Pratt

Reporter/Analyst

Sean Pratt has been working at The Western Producer since 1993 after graduating from the University of Regina’s School of Journalism. Sean also has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Saskatchewan and worked in a bank for a few years before switching careers. Sean primarily writes markets and policy stories about the grain industry and has attended more than 100 conferences over the past three decades. He has received awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Federation, North American Agricultural Journalists and the American Agricultural Editors Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications