Parliamentary Budget Officer updates carbon tax estimate

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 10, 2022

It’s estimated carbon tax costs for things such as grain drying will go from $10 million per year this year to $46 million by 2030-31 in Alberta, $6 million to $28 million in Saskatchewan and from no costs to $2 million in Manitoba. | File photo

Recent report outlines what might happen if the carbon tax exemption on qualifying farm fuel is extended to natural gas and propane

An updated report from the Parliamentary Budget Officer shows that farmers on the Prairies and in Ontario could pay $184 million annually in carbon tax by 2030.

The report released Jan. 20 outlines the cost of extending the exemption on qualifying farm fuel to natural gas and propane, as the private members’ bill C-206 in the previous Parliament outlined. An earlier costing note, released last June, showed costs over five years and was updated to show the increasing tax rate up to $170 per tonne.

Looking at it another way, the estimates are what farmers would pay without an extension of the exemptions.

Read Also

A colour-coded map of Canada showing the various plant hardiness zones.

Canada’s plant hardiness zones receive update

The latest update to Canada’s plant hardiness zones and plant hardiness maps was released this summer.

Conservative agriculture critic John Barlow said the numbers are telling.

“It will cost farmers more than $1 billion.”

He said a farmer told him that his carbon tax bill was $11,000 in December alone.

“He said, ‘I can’t carry this. I just don’t have the margins,” Barlow said.

The breakdown shows that Ontario by far will be hardest hit, with the total at $25 million this year and $108 million by 2030-31.

Alberta will see the cost go from $10 million to $46 million per year and in Saskatchewan the cost rises from $6 million to $28 million. The estimate for Manitoba projects no costs for 2021-22 and $2 million by 2030-31.

In total, more than $1.1 billion will come out of farmers’ pockets if they have to pay the tax.

“This is pretty eye-opening,” said Barlow.

He said tacking on extra costs from the proposed reduction in fertilizer use will be the death knell for some farmers.

“How are farmers going to afford to stay in business?” Barlow said. “What incentive is there to stay?”

He expected the private members’ bill, which didn’t make it through the Senate before the last Parliament prorogued, would be tabled again early in the new parliamentary session that began Jan. 31.

He also said the carbon tax rebate plan set out in the fall economic statement isn’t a solution because farmers will have to pay the tax first and wait to get their money back. Barlow said some could be bankrupt by that time.

About the author

Karen Briere

Karen Briere

Karen Briere grew up in Canora, Sask. where her family had a grain and cattle operation. She has a degree in journalism from the University of Regina and has spent more than 30 years covering agriculture from the Western Producer’s Regina bureau.

explore

Stories from our other publications