Landmark GM suit delayed

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: September 16, 2004

A landmark court hearing that pits organic growers against the makers of genetically modified canola has been postponed.

Members of the Saskatchewan Organic Directorate were set to duke it out with Monsanto Canada Inc. and Bayer CropScience Inc. in a Sept. 14-15 trial that would determine whether the growers had the grounds to launch a class action suit.

They are seeking damages from the two biotechnology companies for the introduction of GM canola, which they claim has destroyed markets for organic canola.

But that hearing has been delayed until sometime in November or December at the behest of the defendants.

Read Also

Tessa Thomas speaks at Ag in Motion about the importance of biosecurity.

Ag in Motion speaker highlights need for biosecurity on cattle operations

Ag in Motion highlights need for biosecurity on cattle farms. Government of Saskatchewan provides checklist on what you can do to make your cattle operation more biosecure.

Lawyers for Monsanto and Bayer requested the additional time to respond to changes in the statement of claim filed by Terry Zakreski, lawyer for Larry Hoffman and Dale Beaudoin, the two Saskatchewan farmers attempting to launch the class action.

The original statement of claim was filed with the Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon nearly three years ago, on Jan. 10, 2002.

“Monsanto is doing everything in their power to duck and dodge us, but we’re coming,” said Zakreski.

Monsanto spokesperson Trish Jordan said the postponement isn’t the fault of the defendants.

“It was Mr. Zakreski who at the 11th hour resubmitted new materials, new amendments, new arguments. We didn’t have anything to do with the delay.”

She also responded to comments made by University of Saskatchewan law professor Martin Phillipson that the organic growers shouldn’t have any problem getting their claim certified by the court as a class action suit.

Jordan said Monsanto’s legal team will argue the growers’ case doesn’t meet any of the requirements for certification and should be dismissed.

“We believe we have a strong case to say that this is probably not an appropriate use of the court’s time.”

About the author

Sean Pratt

Sean Pratt

Reporter/Analyst

Sean Pratt has been working at The Western Producer since 1993 after graduating from the University of Regina’s School of Journalism. Sean also has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Saskatchewan and worked in a bank for a few years before switching careers. Sean primarily writes markets and policy stories about the grain industry and has attended more than 100 conferences over the past three decades. He has received awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Federation, North American Agricultural Journalists and the American Agricultural Editors Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications