Irrigation the key to Sask. cabbage

By 
Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: May 4, 2000

There’s no such thing as king cabbage in Saskatchewan. Most of the bulky, leafy vegetable eaten in that province is trucked in from Alberta and Manitoba.

But researchers think Saskatchewan growers can produce cabbage just as well as their neighbors.

“With our climate, we can grow some pretty good cabbages for low costs,” said Saskatchewan Agriculture vegetable crop specialist Andrew Sullivan.

Riverside Gardens near Regina has been profitably producing cabbages for years, but few other farms produce significant quantities.

Test patches grown by Nipawin-area farmers overseen by a University of Saskatchewan horticultural researcher have shown that Sask-atchewan’s northeastern grainbelt is perfect cabbage territory.

Read Also

Jared Epp stands near a small flock of sheep and explains how he works with his stock dogs as his border collie, Dot, waits for command.

Stock dogs show off herding skills at Ag in Motion

Stock dogs draw a crowd at Ag in Motion. Border collies and other herding breeds are well known for the work they do on the farm.

“Nipawin represents an excellent area for growing high quality cabbage, particularly under irrigation,” said Doug Waterer, who has overseen a three-year production experiment in the area. But growers who don’t use irrigation run considerable risks, the study showed.

In 1998, two dryland growers and three irrigation farmers grew small acreages of cabbage. That summer there was only four inches of rain.

The dryland growers lost $900 per acre, but the irrigation farmers made $1,000 profit per acre.

In 1999, there was more rain, and both dryland and irrigation farmers made about $1,000 profit per acre.

Only irrigation farmers will participate in this year’s study.

Sullivan said the Nipawin area is perfect for cabbage because it has long, hot days and cool nights, which helps control disease and pests.

Sullivan said other parts of the province should also be good for growing cabbages.

The study also compared plants started in a greenhouse to those planted in the field and found the greenhouse step can be avoided, saving seven to nine cents per plant, or $1,000 per acre.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

explore

Stories from our other publications