FNA ponders farmer-owned fertilizer plant

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: May 4, 2012

Not an easy road | Past experience says going could get tough when fertilizer prices fall

Companies wanting to gain a foothold in Western Canada’s grain handling sector are trying to convince farmers to sell their inland terminals.

However, one group is telling producers they should be expanding their ownership of grain industry assets.

“We think that farmers should really seriously consider getting into fertilizer manufacturing,” said Bob Friesen, chief executive officer of Farmers of North America Strategic Agriculture Institute.

The organization recently took out an ad in The Western Producer urging growers to consider the idea.

Friesen said if Glencore’s takeover of Viterra is approved, Agrium will own more than half of Canada’s nitrogen production and “virtually monopolize” the retailing of farm inputs in this country.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

Growing control of the fertilizer sector by one company provides impetus to consider such a venture.

“The environment is right now to start talking about it,” he said.

Friesen said there is a good level of interest among the producers he has spoken to about the idea.

Farmer frustration with fertilizer reached the boiling point in 2008 when prices spiked in response to high grain prices, reducing profit margins on the farm.

There is a precedent in New Zealand for the business model that FNA proposes. In that country, growers own Ravensdown and Balance Agri-Nutrients Ltd., two of the country’s leading fertilizer companies.

David Asbridge, president of NPK Fertilizer Advisory Service, applauds FNA for promoting the plan.

“The idea behind what they’re doing I think is a good idea because right now natural gas is really cheap in North America,” he said.

The cost of producing urea is about $100 US per tonne at the plant and around $200 per tonne by the time it is delivered to farmers in the U.S. Midwest, where growers are paying $600 per tonne for the product.

“Margins are phenomenal, I can guarantee you,” said Asbridge.

However, he thinks a farmer-owned plant would face stiff competition in years when margins are tight, which could be around the corner.

Interest in building new capacity increases when fertilizer prices are high, which is what has been happening recently.

Huge nitrogen fertilizer plants have been built in China and the Middle East, causing growth in production capacity to outstrip growth in demand.

Nitrogen fertilizer prices move in a cyclical pattern that Asbridge describes as a sideways “S,” and he believes they’re about to turn down.

“We’re kind of at the tipping point.”

Based on past experience, it would be difficult when prices fall for a small farmer-owned facility to compete with a urea production plant churning out two million tonnes of product per year.

Farmland Industries, the largest agricultural co-operative in North America, declared bankruptcy in 2002, due in large part to a prolonged downturn in fertilizer prices.

Asbridge worked for CF Industries when it was a farmer-owned co-operative. The business had its challenges when prices were low. In 2005, members decided to turn the co-op into a publicly traded company.

A fertilizer manufacturing plant is an expensive venture, he warned, costing about $1.5 billion to build a two million tonne urea facility.

“We know that investing in fertilizer manufacturing would cost a lot of money. There’s no question about that,” said Friesen.

That’s why FNA has met with the federal agriculture minister, the deputy minister and senior officials within the department to discuss rule changes for the more than $1 billion that farmers have saved in the federal AgriInvest program.

FNA wants Ottawa to defer or waive the taxes on the government’s share of the AgriInvest money if it is invested in a venture that maximizes future revenue for farmers, such as a fertilizer manufacturing plant.

“There seems to be interest in what we’re suggesting,” said Friesen.

He hopes it will be a topic of discussion when federal and provincial agriculture ministers gather in Whitehorse in September.

About the author

Sean Pratt

Sean Pratt

Reporter/Analyst

Sean Pratt has been working at The Western Producer since 1993 after graduating from the University of Regina’s School of Journalism. Sean also has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Saskatchewan and worked in a bank for a few years before switching careers. Sean primarily writes markets and policy stories about the grain industry and has attended more than 100 conferences over the past three decades. He has received awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Federation, North American Agricultural Journalists and the American Agricultural Editors Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications