AU claims policy not contradictory

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 2, 2006

Agricore United’s new policy on the Own Use Import program is not at odds with the stance the company has taken through CropLife Canada, says an AU spokesperson.

Ninety-six percent of the 136 delegates attending the grain company’s annual meeting in February voted in favour of a resolution calling on Agricore to lobby the federal government to continue a program that has decreased production costs for Canadian farmers.

One observer claimed that represents a significant policy change for an organization that has raised a “litany of objections” about the controversial Pest Management Regulatory Agency program.

Read Also

An aerial image of the DP World canola oil transloading facility taken at night, with three large storage tanks all lit up in the foreground.

Canola oil transloading facility opens

DP World just opened its new canola oil transload facility at the Port of Vancouver. It can ship one million tonnes of the commodity per year.

Agricore United is one of the largest members of CropLife Canada, a chemical industry lobby group that is out to destroy the OUI program, said Farmers of North America vice-president Glen Caleval.

Objections filed by CropLife and other interested parties prompted the PMRA to launch a review of its popular program through which farmers imported 5.7 million litres of generic glyphosate from the United States in 2005.

A report is due in March that will provide recommendations on how to change the OUI program that claimed an estimated 18 percent of Canada’s annual glyphosate sales.

Cam Dahl, government relations and policy development officer for Agricore United, said there is no policy paradox because CropLife is not out to obliterate the OUI program. It wants answers to a series of questions it has posed to the PMRA.

“Farmers of North America have spun that to say that people raising these questions are trying to shut down the Own Use Import program. That is not the case. We’re not.”

Agricore United and other input providers are raising concerns about issues like stewardship, liability, investment chill and trade implications of farmers importing and using a chemical that is not registered in Canada.

“We are concerned that the use of an unregistered pesticide will be used by our competitors as a non-tariff trade barrier,” said Dahl.

The company is also seeking clarification on third party involvement, wondering why a firm like Farmers of North America can broker the import of glyphosate on behalf of its members while Agricore United is not allowed to participate in the program.

There is a big distinction between asking questions and calling for the end to the program, said Dahl.

The company intends to follow the will of its delegates and lobby the federal government to maintain the OUI program, but that support will be subject to the PMRA resolving some of the concerns raised by CropLife Canada, he said.

About the author

Sean Pratt

Sean Pratt

Reporter/Analyst

Sean Pratt has been working at The Western Producer since 1993 after graduating from the University of Regina’s School of Journalism. Sean also has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Saskatchewan and worked in a bank for a few years before switching careers. Sean primarily writes markets and policy stories about the grain industry and has attended more than 100 conferences over the past three decades. He has received awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Federation, North American Agricultural Journalists and the American Agricultural Editors Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications