Your reading list

U.S. farmers end up with large crop

By 
Ed White
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: September 20, 2001

The many reports about decaying crops from across the United States have not resulted in the disappointing harvest many analysts expected, according to a U.S. Department of Agriculture report released Sept. 14.

“It was a bit of a shock,” said Carol Gunvaldsen, a Manitoba Agriculture grains market analyst.

“It was a shock for a lot of people to see the yields so high.”

However, the surprisingly large crop has not pushed down prices as much as analysts would expect, Gunvaldsen said. That’s probably because of the unsettled world situation.

Read Also

Looking down a gravel road in the middle of a blizzard. Visibility is very limited, snow has blown over the road and there are power poles and a barbed wire fence along the field on the left side of the road.

Volatile temperatures expected for this winter

DTN is forecasting a lot of temperature variability in the Canadian Prairies this winter. Precipitation should be close to average.

“There’s a huge amount of uncertainty,” she said.

The USDA found both corn and soybean production will be almost as large as it appeared to be one month before. Many analysts had expected the crop volumes to shrink, due to heat and dryness in July and August.

Corn production is expected to be only one percent less than forecast one month before, which is a seven percent drop from 2000.

Soybean production will create a record harvest, at 2.83 billion bushels, which is two percent above 2000. It is also only a one percent decline from a month before.

Wheat production is forecast to be slightly up, while durum is well down, with a six percent drop from last month and a 21 percent drop from a year ago.

Analysts saw the report as generally bearish. On Sept. 14 and 17, many commodity prices moved lower.

However, prices for most grains are still substantially higher than last year, and that shouldn’t change, Gunvaldsen said. This is more an alteration of expectations than a fundamental change in world supplies.

Alberta Agriculture grains market analyst Charlie Pearson said there has been comparatively little market reaction to this report.

“It’s one of those weird things,” he said. “It’s being overshadowed by other events.”

The terrorist attack on New York and Washington has shaken many, and its impact on the world is still unknown.

Tremors on world stock markets, and fears about food security and transportation systems have made people think twice about food supplies.

Gunvaldsen said the terrorist strike and the fear of war could reverse the long-standing trend of grain importers reducing stocks at home and relying on just-in-time imports.

If buyers begin stockpiling grain, they might not be so relaxed about the relatively small world stocks. That would be positive for grain prices as buyers increased purchases to rebuild stockpiles.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

explore

Stories from our other publications