U.S., call off your trade dogs: CFA

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 21, 2002

American farmers are launching trade challenges against Canadian

farmers because Canadians are beating them in the marketplace and

because they do things differently, says Canadian Federation of

Agriculture president Bob Friesen.

“These challenges come because on many fronts we outcompete the U.S.,”

said Friesen after a debate with the president of the North Dakota Farm

Bureau in front of the Manitoba Farm Writers and Broadcasters

Association.

“We don’t like the U.S. just looking for excuses.”

Read Also

Field peas in flower at a Discovery Farm demonstration plot.

Russian pulse trouble reports denied

Russia’s pulse crop will be larger than last year, which won’t help prices rally from their doldrums.

During the debate, Friesen highlighted what he considers examples of

American trade harassment.

Friesen said the leader of a national American hog producer

organization recently told him that his group was thinking of launching

another trade challenge against Canadian hog producers. The reason: the

American herd is not growing, but Canada’s has expanded by 25 percent.

Friesen also attacked the North Dakota Wheat Commission’s trade

challenge of the Canadian Wheat Board.

“Call off the dogs in the U.S.,” said Friesen.

Eric Aasmundstad, president of the North Dakota Farm Bureau, said he

was not an expert on the wheat commission’s challenge of the wheat

board, but his organization supports it.

“We’d like to see some transparency. I think that would go a long way,”

said Aasmundstad. “Does that exist? Some would say it does. Some would

say it doesn’t.”

Aasmundstad said he doesn’t think the wheat commission’s trade

challenge is unfounded, but he raised doubts about whether it is likely

to be successful.

“I think there is a case of some sort,” said Aasmundstad.

“But is it an enforceable case? I have to wonder. Because in my mind if

it was, the United States Trade Representative would have come down a

lot harder than they have.”

Friesen said American farmers often lobby for trade challenges

regardless of the evidence.

“I don’t think there’s necessarily always a good reason for their

challenges,” said Friesen.

The American government has been happy to channel money to farmers and

to support the challenges as a means of driving others from the

marketplace, said Friesen. The subsidies allow American farmers to

survive amid low commodity prices, which are partly created by the

subsidies themselves, and the challenges allow the American government

keep foreign goods out of their market.

“It’s a long term strategy, I believe, of cross subsidization as well

as buying international markets,” said Friesen.

He attacked the American government for undermining new crops grown by

Canadian farmers who are trying to avoid the subsidy wars. Adding some

pulse crops into the U.S. farm bill shows the American government is

acting in a predatory manner.

Aasmundstad said his organization opposed the inclusion of new crops in

the farm bill. He said the government’s hope was to protect prices to

help farmers, but in practice the government has destroyed each market

in which it has interfered.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications