U.S. bill may send hog prices down

By 
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: February 21, 2002

Pig farmers were expecting at least two more years of good prices, but

the United States Senate may have planted a time bomb on the industry,

says University of Missouri agricultural economist Ron Plain.

“This could get us a real disaster before the year’s over,” said Plain

about a recent addition to the U.S. Senate’s version of the farm bill.

The Senate and the House of Representatives, which passed its version

of the farm bill last fall, now must negotiate a compromise bill to

Read Also

A wheat head in a ripe wheat field west of Marcelin, Saskatchewan, on August 27, 2022.

USDA’s August corn yield estimates are bearish

The yield estimates for wheat and soybeans were neutral to bullish, but these were largely a sideshow when compared with corn.

consider for passage into law.

Plain said if this provision becomes part of the law, a number of old

packing plants could close, including the giant Sioux Falls, South

Dakota plant that many prairie pig producers ship to.

“If that plant does get shut down, we’ll face a situation this fall in

having prices like we had in 1998.”

The provision is called the Johnson amendment, after Tim Johnson, the

South Dakota senator who introduced it to the Senate bill. It bans

packers from owning livestock for more than 14 days before they

slaughter the animals.

With up to one in four market hogs produced in packer-owned farms, that

could lead to a lot of corporate restructuring, Plain said.

Some packers may sell their hog farms or spin them off as separate

corporations. But other companies may decide that their aging,

inefficient plants are not worth either move.

“We worry a great deal that the company may decide the best way to go

is just to shut down the plant,” said Plain.

The Sioux Falls plant is a major processor, killing 16,000 pigs per

day, but it is also a century old. It probably isn’t worth much and

doesn’t have a bright future, Plain said.

Recently Smithfield Foods, which owns the Sioux Falls plant, ran

newspaper advertisements in South Dakota warning that it might shut the

plant if the Johnson amendment becomes law. Johnson wasn’t

intimidated by the warning and helped shepherd his amendment through.

If that plant or others close, a crisis could erupt in the fourth

quarter of this year, Plain said. Hog production is still seasonal,

with a bulge in the production of market hogs in the last three months

of every year.

A shortfall in packer capacity, known as the “shackle space problem,”

caused the 1998 price meltdown. That could happen again, Plain said.

“Anything that causes us to fall very short on kill capacity could

leave us in a crunch and reproduce those disastrously low prices we had

in 1998,” he said.

Plain doubts the Johnson amendment will serve the purpose many hog

farmers want.

Some major companies, such as Smithfield, may decide not to sell their

hog farms. They may instead ditch their packing plants.

“A lot of the advocates envisioned that they would sell off the hogs,

but I don’t think those firms will choose to do that,” he said about

three major packer-producers.

By hanging onto the hog farms, these companies will be able to continue

their drive for integrated production, in which quality is controlled

all the way from genetics at birth to the grocery store.

The law bans packers from owning or controlling hog production, but it

doesn’t stop hog producers from controlling packers, Plain said.

If Smithfield spun off its packing plant division, it could keep its

farms, its meat marketers and all other parts of its organization. It

could make a long-term contract with its present packing plants to

process all of its pigs, as they do now, and have the packing plants

hand over the cut meat to Smithfield.

“It is simply a toll packer for you,” said Plain.

These companies aren’t going to easily give up control of the meat from

the barn to the plate.

Wholesalers, grocery stores and consumers are all demanding more

information about where their meat came from and how it was produced.

“There’s enormous pressure to not go back to where we were 30 years

ago, when all we had was anonymous meat,” said Plain.

“The market forces are too great to go back.”

So while the U.S. Senate may believe it’s helping farmers, it may end

up instead leaving a significant share of pig production in the hands

of corporations and destroy the prices that farmers receive, Plain said.

While the Senate version of the farm bill contains the Johnson

amendment, the House of Representatives version does not. The two

houses must draft a compromise bill before voting it into law so the

Johnson amendment won’t necessarily be part of the final version.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications