Trouble at the WCE: What’s wrong with the contracts?

By 
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: November 21, 2002

Tony Tryhuk knew it had been a slow year for traders at the Winnipeg

Commodity Exchange, but he was shocked when he calculated his company’s

annual results for the year that ended Oct. 31.

RBC Investments trades futures and options at the exchange. Tryhuk,

manager of trading, saw the company’s canola futures trade in 2001-02

fall 21 percent from the previous year, its canola options trade fall

74 percent and its flax volume fall 56

percent.

“Man oh man, are they ever taking it on the chin,” Tryhuk said.

Read Also

Two combines, one in front of the other, harvest winter wheat.

China’s grain imports have slumped big-time

China purchased just over 20 million tonnes of wheat, corn, barley and sorghum last year, that is well below the 60 million tonnes purchased in 2021-22.

“This can’t simply be the drought.”

Many in the grain industry are wondering what can explain the collapse

of trade volume in so many of the exchange’s contracts.

“I have no idea exactly why,” said Ken Ball of trading company Benson

Quinn GMS.

October 2002 was a dismal month for all exchange contracts except

canola, which only fell slightly.

Canola meal volume dropped by about 82 percent, flax fell 65 percent,

barley 43 percent and feed wheat 69 percent.

Traders and others speculate the slump comes from several factors,

including the Agricore-United Grain Growers merger a year ago, this

year’s small crop and contract design problems. However, there is no

consensus on which factor is the most important.

Exchange economist Lyndon Peters puts the blame on the small crop.

Grain companies have little grain to buy from farmers or sell to

customers and so have little activity to hedge by buying futures and

options.

“It’s just related to the amount of activity in the underlying cash

market,” Peters said. “With that decline in the level of trade going

on, there’s less of a need to actively hedge those commodities.”

He said canola futures volume has dropped less than feed grains because

speculative trading in canola fills in some of the gap. If canola

futures volume had dropped at the same rate as commercial activity in

the cash market, futures would be off by half. However, speculators

stepped in. That rarely happens in wheat and barley.

“We just don’t have the same amount of speculative activity in feed

grains markets,” Peters said.

Canola options volume has also slumped, down 88.9 percent this October

compared to last October and down 81.3 percent in the year-to-date.

Peters said that is also a sign of decreased commercial activity. Few

speculators use that market.

But the slump in flax futures isn’t explained by the drought, because

flax was not nearly as affected by western prairie conditions as other

crops. Yet there was almost two-thirds less trade in flax futures in

October 2002 compared to October 2001.

Traders and analysts say they think a complex mix of contract design

factors, changes in the flax industry and the Agricore United merger

are behind the fall in flax volume. It has fallen so much that some

traders don’t like using the contract.

The exchange and industry will debate the first two problems this

winter, but they won’t be able to overcome another factor – last year’s

Agricore-UGG merger.

It was followed by AU absorbing Xcan Grain, which had formerly acted

independently from its owner, Agricore. As an exporter, it would use

futures and options to hedge grain purchases and sales. Often, Xcan and

the grain companies it dealt with would take opposite sides on

transactions, which created a lot of trading.

But AU is now able to reduce its price risks within the company because

it controls the grain from the elevator to the customer.

“There could have been some inter-company transactions that aren’t

required any longer that may have resulted in lower volumes on the

trading floor,” said Brad Vannan, AU’s managing director of

merchandising and transportation.

Until a normal-sized crop comes along, it will be hard to tell how much

change there has been.

“We absolutely need the commodity exchange and the service it

provides,” Vannan said.

“Is our participation down there as much as it was between the three

heritage companies (that merged to form AU)? Probably not …, but it’s

really going to be difficult to determine what (effect) this merger has

had on the commodity exchange until we get to have a crop the size that

existed pre-merger.”

Tryhuk said he thinks overall grain industry consolidation has shrunk

the stable of companies that trade WCE futures and options.

“There are simply fewer players left in Winnipeg.”

However, Peters said there is still room for growth in the number of

users of WCE contracts.

For canola, the exchange hopes to make its contracts more attractive to

American, Australian and possibly European users.

Few farmers are actively involved in trading feed grains, which the WCE

wants to change.

Peters said the dire state of many of the contracts doesn’t look good,

but it reflects the state of Prairie grain production.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications