Your reading list

Ottawa outlines standards for nutraceutical products

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: January 10, 2002

Many people like to complain about government inefficiency, but you

won’t hear that from the Saskatchewan Nutraceutical Network.

The network, which represents producers and processors of medicinal

plants and herbs such as echinacea, says federal officials are on

target and on schedule to soon give Canada the world’s best

nutraceutical regulations.

“It’s actually moving at quite a good pace,” said Kelley Fitzpatrick,

the network’s executive director.

“We could see the labelling regulations come into force as soon as a

Read Also

Two combines, one in front of the other, harvest winter wheat.

China’s grain imports have slumped big-time

China purchased just over 20 million tonnes of wheat, corn, barley and sorghum last year, that is well below the 60 million tonnes purchased in 2021-22.

year and a half from now.”

In December, the government published the regulations in the Canada

Gazette, which is the first part of the process to make the rules law.

The regulations lay out how manufacturers must test, prove, manufacture

and license their products. They also detail what kinds of health

claims can be made on the product package.

It is now illegal to make health claims for a product that does not

have a drug identification number, or DIN. Getting a DIN is complicated

and expensive.

The other option for medicinal plant producers is to sell their

products without any health claims, which would confuse consumers who

don’t know what the product is supposed to be used for.

American nutraceutical makers are allowed many things that Canadian

producers are not, such as making indirect health claims and offering

mixtures of vitamins, minerals and nutraceuticals. United States

manufacturers can also release their products onto the market without

getting government approval.

This approach has led to the U.S. industry having many more

nutraceutical products and much better visibility than their Canadian

counterparts.

But Fitzpatrick said the U.S. industry is now reeling from problems

caused by weak regulations. Since some products were untested and made

poorly, many consumers have become skeptical of all nutraceuticals.

“Consumers are saying ‘hey, this doesn’t work.’

“It’s really painted a bad image of the industry, which the industry is

having to recover from.”

Fitzpatrick said the Canadian federal government’s decision to make

nutraceuticals more heavily regulated than food products but less

regulated than pharmaceuticals is the right approach.

“Are they a food? Are they a drug? They don’t fit into either. The

regulations need to be more stringent than for foods, but less

stringent than for drugs.”

Federal officials with the Office of Natural Health Products are now

compiling standards for the manufacturing and health claims of various

natural health products. Specifications of each product will be in a

government list.

When a new commercial form of an existing approved substance comes to

market, the manufacturer will only need to inform the government that

it is releasing the product and that it meets the specifications.

But if a new commercial product contains a substance that is not

already detailed, the producer will have to provide officials with

information about what it does, how it is made and whether it is safe.

Once these regulations become law, Canada will be on the cutting edge

of world nutraceutical production and marketing.

“They go further than anyplace else in the world,” said Fitzpatrick.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications