Your reading list

Keystone proud of broad support

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: January 31, 2002

Volker Wyrich sat through three days of Keystone Agricultural Producers

sessions on agricultural policy and came out smiling.

The wide-ranging policy debates didn’t seem irrelevant to the 27 year

old, who farms in Oakbank, Man. They were talking about his future.

“I’m a farmer and I’m concerned about the future of farming,” said

Wyrich, a delegate to the KAP annual convention held Jan. 23-25 in

Winnipeg. “I want to stay in farming.”

Wyrich, who raises pigs and grows grain with his father, said KAP can

Read Also

Two combines, one in front of the other, harvest winter wheat.

China’s grain imports have slumped big-time

China purchased just over 20 million tonnes of wheat, corn, barley and sorghum last year, that is well below the 60 million tonnes purchased in 2021-22.

focus on issues that commodity groups just can’t deal with.

“We need an organization where we’re united in a common goal, and

that’s to farm,” Wyrich said.

That’s the message retiring KAP president Don Dewar thinks more

Manitoba farmers are accepting.

“We don’t agree on everything in this organization, but there are

things we share,” said Dewar, who was KAP president for four years

before stepping down at this convention.

KAP is the most broad-based farm lobby organization on the Prairies. It

is supported by a refundable checkoff from farmers’ grain deliveries,

but also gets membership dues from all of Manitoba’s major commodity

groups, making it a true umbrella organization.

KAP’s base recently grew when the Manitoba Canola Growers Association

decided to join.

Dewar said most Manitoba farmers realize that they are better served by

having one main farm voice than dozens of disparate whispers.

Some of the organizations that belong to KAP may dislike some official

KAP policies, Dewar said, but most feel it’s better to be inside the

organization trying to change policies than be outside and have no say.

“They recognize we need one voice,” he said. “If they disagree with

some of our policies, they can get in and express their opinions.”

Since KAP policy votes are passed on a 50 percent plus one basis, it’s

easy to affect the organization’s positions if enough farmers want to

change them, Dewar said.

KAP has a good rapport with the provincial government, which generally

consults the group on major agricultural issues, and also lobbies the

federal government on Manitoba issues, Dewar said.

Alberta and Saskatchewan farmers would benefit from a similarly strong

voice, Dewar added.

In Saskatchewan, the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan

is presently trying to build a broad-based organization like KAP.

In Alberta, Wild Rose Agricultural Producers is a much weaker general

farm group than KAP, Dewar said. That isn’t the fault of its members,

he added, but due to government policy, which supports commodity-based

commissions and organizations instead of an umbrella organization.

“I think the government in Alberta would rather have a bunch of smaller

voices and that way they can do what they want. It’s divide and

conquer.”

Alberta farmers suffer because they lack a strong voice speaking for

all farmers. The commissions and commodity groups can only speak about

their specific commodities, and can’t claim a mandate to represent

farmers’ general interests.

Dewar was pleased to see commodity group representatives go to the

microphone and give their perspectives on various issues.

“We’re a mini-federation. Who else represents that broad a spectrum?”

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications