Feed wheat glut has pros and cons

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: September 26, 2002

There’s little barley out there, but cattle feeders will be trying to

fill its place with the suddenly large quantities of feed wheat being

harvested on the Prairies.

That’s not going to be easy, because there’s good feed wheat, bad feed

wheat and ugly feed wheat.

“It’s going to be a good year for the nutritionists to try to figure

out how to make a good ration out of it,” said Marsha Cannon, a feedlot

operator and past president of the Saskatchewan Cattle Feeders

Read Also

Close-up of a few soft white wheat heads with a yellow combine blurry in the background.

European wheat production makes big recovery

EU crop prospects are vastly improved, which could mean fewer canola and durum imports from Canada.

Association.

“It’s a real piecemeal situation.”

A litany of weather woes has affected wheat crops for the past two

months. Early August frosts reduced many wheat crops to feed quality.

At the same time, heavy rains caused sprouting in winter wheat crops.

Spring wheat has been hit at harvest time with repeated rains that have

caused sprouting and mildew.

Saskatchewan Agriculture said last week that of the crops so far

harvested, only 13 percent was estimated to grade No. 1, compared to a

10 year average of 52 percent.

“Definitely there’s been a lot of feed wheat created out there,” said

Calgary grain broker Doug Chambers.

“Once we figure how much is out there we’ll see a lot trading into the

feedlots.”

Feed wheat futures on the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange have not

noticeably slumped in the past few weeks, but Chambers said that’s

because the feed wheat specified by the contract is still a rare

commodity.

“The futures on feed wheat have no relevance to the cash price,”

Chambers said.

“A lot of what’s out there doesn’t make mill quality for the feed

mills. That’s what’s keeping the 58 pound (wheat) high.”

A low bushel weight is bad for feed wheat users. When the weight is

low, the energy level tends to be low and the fibre proportion high,

which isn’t what feeders want.

“While the (low bushel weight feed wheat) may be cheaper, if you’ve got

to keep them longer, in the end it’s not necessarily going to cost you

less to feed the animal,” Cannon said.

Chambers said he has seen a lot of samples of 50 to 54 lb. wheat. He’s

been selling small lots of it to feedlots.

But he thinks feedlots will become less anxious about feed shortages

after harvest, when it becomes obvious a large percentage of the wheat

crop will be fit only for feed.

Producers shouldn’t assume feedlots will be begging for their light

feed wheat.

“If you’ve got a sub-58 lb. product, I’d be looking for a market pretty

quick, because that thing’s going to shake out and come down because

there’s scads of it around,” Chambers said.

He has already heard reports of people willing to trade three tonnes of

sub-58 lb. feed wheat for one tonne of over-58 lb. feed wheat.

Feeders’ needs vary

Cannon said cattle feeders will be choosy about what kind of feed wheat

they will accept. A feedlot will not use mouldy wheat in a finishing

ration because it will be inconsistent, but a backgrounder may be

willing to use it.

Even though feed wheat qualities may be wildly variable and much of it

will be hard to use, Cannon said the large quantities mean that many

cattle feeders will be able to avoid using non-traditional feeds.

However, she knows of some feeders who are looking at using everything

from canola silage to chaff and screenings to round out their rations

this winter.

Chambers said he thinks feed wheat will be the commodity that sets the

ceiling price for barley this winter, the way American corn did last

winter.

If barley prices get too far out of line, users will increase the

amount of feed wheat in cattle rations.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications