Your reading list

Contract timing makes it tough to catch price rallies

By 
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: July 18, 2002

Farmers watching the Canadian Wheat Board’s Fixed Price Contract

program, or FPC, noticed something odd and unsettling for a few days

after June 27.

Hard red spring wheat futures were roaring higher, but prices offered

to farmers by the FPC fell.

A big weather rally was occurring on the Minneapolis Grain Exchange,

but farmers weren’t being offered all the gains.

That changed as grain futures continued to surge, but by July 12,

futures had increased by $23.20 from June 27, while the FPC had only

Read Also

The nose of a CN train engine rounding a corner is in the foreground with its grain cars visible in the background.

Canada-U.S. trade relationship called complex

Trade issues existed long before U.S. president Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again tariffs came along, said panelists at a policy summit last month.

risen $10.10.

To Alberta Agriculture market analyst Charlie Pearson, this kind of a

situation hurts the program’s credibility.

“It makes it a less desirable alternative than it might have been,”

said Pearson.

“I think that it’s important for farmers to be able to capture some of

these weather rallies.”

On June 25, Minneapolis hard red spring wheat futures were trading for

$178.33 per tonne and the fixed price contract was offering $203.05,

which was the result of the futures price plus that month’s FPC basis.

The wheat board’s Pool Return Outlook was forecasting final prices of

$202.

On June 27, the Minneapolis hard red spring wheat rally had begun,

taking December futures up to $186.23. But the FPC price dropped to

$197.85. That was because the basis had fallen from $24.72-over to

$11.62-over.

It took until July 2 to catch back up to the June 25 FPC price.

Laurence Klusa, the wheat board’s head of risk management, said the

late-June, early-July situation was created by the change in basis

levels, which are set once per month on the day the PRO is released.

The basis reflects the difference between the PRO and the futures price

on the day the PRO is released, but also includes deductions for the

time value of money, an administration charge and a risk premium.

Generally, the FPC price should be less than the PRO price by a few

dollars to reflect those three deductions.

But the basis can vary depending on the range between PRO and futures

prices because the board’s risk changes, Klusa said.

If market prices are below wheat board expectations, there is more risk

and a higher risk premium. If the market price is above board

expectations, the risk premium shrinks.

There can also be a change in the difference between the PRO price and

the futures price. A sudden price surge can have a big effect on the

FPC.

“We’ve had some pretty significant price moves,” said board risk

manager Richard Dzisiak. “It’s been pretty dramatic.”

The increasing futures price during June meant that by the end of the

last PRO period, the FPC price wasn’t discounted compared to the PRO

price, but was above it by $1.05 per tonne.

The FPC price at the start of that PRO period, on May 24, was $3.25

below the PRO price.

On June 27, the PRO and the FPC basis were reset, bringing the FPC

price back under the PRO by $3.15.

That means that between the two PROs the differential didn’t change

much, but swings in the futures market caused often significant day to

day swings.

If basis levels were reset every day, the price anomaly that occurred

in late June and early July wouldn’t have occurred. But Dzisiak said

the program is based on some fixed foundations.

“You need to keep a couple of things stable,” said Dzisiak.

Klusa said producers may want to pay more attention to basis levels if

they are thinking of using the board’s fixed price contracts.

“If the producer is just looking at the fixed price contract price, he

may not be looking that closely at the basis,” he said.

But the board’s basis contract program, which complements the fixed

price contract, allows farmers to lock in a basis before or after they

accept a futures price.

“If producers watch it closely enough, they’d be wise to sign up with

the larger basis,” said Klusa.

Pearson thinks the board should consider coming out with a new PRO if

the markets move dramatically, to avoid huge shifts in the FPC basis.

“If price levels or market conditions change fairly significantly in

between your typical fourth Thursdays, then you could come out with a

PRO in between,” he said.

Pearson has suggested farmers use the FPC program to get quick cash

flow after harvest, something that could be useful this year.

“The opportunity is there to maybe lock in a bit of a better price than

Pool Return Outlooks,” said Pearson.

“Even in a drought year, your cash flow is important, and it may be

that a farmer has to sell his whole crop off the combine just to pay

his bills.”

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications