Canadian, U.S. industry heads discuss ag policies

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: July 5, 2007

MOOSE JAW, Sask. – Farmers in both Canada and the United States are waiting for new federal agriculture policies.

Wish lists and suggestions have been made, and Canadian agriculture ministers met last week in Whistler, B.C., to discuss the next agricultural policy framework.

The 2007 U.S. farm bill likely won’t look much different than the 2002 version, said an American economist.

Joe Outlaw, from Texas A & M University, pegged the chances of major changes at less than 25 percent.

“The reason is because there’s no money to change to anything else,” he told the recent Farming For Profit? conference.

Read Also

Tight photo of the spout of an auger with canola seed flowing out of it. A man's gloved hand can be seen, probably in communication with the auger operator below.

Farmers urged to be grain-safe this fall

Working around grain bins comes with risk, from farmers falling to drowning in grain: Experts have five tips to help avoid grain-related accidents this harvest.

He said some proposals never stood a chance of going forward and some were never intended to. One suggested hiking loan rates and target prices and would have been “absolutely a slap” with regard to world trade compliance.

One proposal advocated an account system similar to Canada’s.

Outlaw said he believes the 2007 bill will still contain some direct payments to farmers.

Chuck Moss, an economist from the University of Florida, said there could be a reduction in payment caps in the next bill, which would also cause compliance issues.

Both Americans said support for corn will continue despite the boom in ethanol production.

“Corn yields keep rising but prices aren’t,” Moss said.

Outlaw said if oil prices go below $30 US a barrel, corn-based ethanol will be in trouble and prices will drop.

National Farmers Union president Stewart Wells said Canada’s agricultural policy is substantially different than its neighbour’s and that’s because Canada doesn’t have one.

“It’s my view that what we’ve got is a trade policy,” he said.

Legislated marketing tools such as the Canadian Wheat Board and supply management are examples of that policy. They are always attacked at world trade talks.

“Nobody is attacking patent protection,” he said.

“It’s a tool, too.”

Ian Wishart, vice-president of Keystone Agricultural Producers, said agricultural policy should reward farmers for their land stewardship.

“We need a mechanism that pays back to producers when you do the right things,” he said.

About the author

Karen Briere

Karen Briere

Karen Briere grew up in Canora, Sask. where her family had a grain and cattle operation. She has a degree in journalism from the University of Regina and has spent more than 30 years covering agriculture from the Western Producer’s Regina bureau.

explore

Stories from our other publications