(Reuters) — Voters in Colorado rejected a measure to require labelling of foods made with genetically modified ingredients, and a similar Oregon initiative looked headed for defeat on Tuesday.
The outcome at the polls came after corporate food and agriculture interests poured more than US $36 million into anti-labelling campaigns in the two states.
The same group of companies, which include the biotech seed and chemical companies Monsanto and DuPont, helped defeat similar measures in California and Washington state in 2012 and 2013.
The Colorado labelling measure captured only about 32 percent voter approval, versus 68 percent opposed, according to preliminary results. Opponents raised more than $16 million on efforts to kill the measure, compared with $895,000 raised by those pushing for passage, according to the secretary of state’s office and campaign finance filings.
Read Also
USDA considering economic aid for farmers this fall, says secretary
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is working with Congress to evaluate whether economic aid might be needed for the nation’s farmers this fall amid trade disputes and record-high yields, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on Monday.
In Oregon, where labelling opponents put together more than $20 million for campaigning, compared with $8 million raised by supporters, the initiative was failing by 51.4 percent to 48.6 percent, according to preliminary results.
Several other states are eying GMO labelling measures. Labelling proponents say GMOs can be harmful for humans and the environment. But opponents say GMOs have been proven safe and that mandatory labelling would be costly and confusing for consumers.
Connecticut and Maine have passed GMO labelling laws, but both states require other states to pass labelling bills before the laws take effect. Vermont has passed a mandatory labelling law with no other requirements. It is set to take effect in 2016, but labelling opponents have sued to try to block the law.
