New zone protects beef reputation – WP editorial

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: September 19, 2002

BOVINE tuberculosis in an insidious disease. It can spread through

feed, water and in saliva and mucous coughed into the air. It can lie

dormant in infected animals for years and present itself at slaughter

before producers even realize there’s a problem.

That’s what makes proposed zoning protocols for the area around Riding

Mountain National Park in western Manitoba so important.

The Canada Beef Export Federation estimates that income from all

aspects of beef cattle production totalled more than $7.8 billion in

Read Also

Looking down a fence line with a blooming yellow canola crop on the right side of the fence, a ditch and tree on the left, with five old metal and wooden granaries in the background.

Producers face the reality of shifting grain price expectations

Significant price shifts have occurred in various grains as compared to what was expected at the beginning of the calendar year. Crop insurance prices can be used as a base for the changes.

2001.

Total beef and veal exports reached $2.2 billion last year, with $1.7

billion worth of that going to the United States. The need to act

decisively to ensure continued strong exports is clear. The stakes are

too high to do otherwise.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has proposed a plan. It suggests a

new zone that would allow most cattle producers in Manitoba, those

outside the zone, to retain their TB-free status.

Cattle within the zone, an area near the national park, would be given

the lower rating of TB accredited, which means the disease prevalence

is low.

Animals from this zone would require more stringent testing and

certification before they are exported.

In a time when U.S. cattle groups are scouring the fine print of trade

deals looking for challenges to Canadian agriculture, we must ensure we

are doing all we can to control the disease and protect the health

status of the national herd.

However, cattle producers living inside the proposed new zone have

raised valid concerns that must be addressed first.

The proposal seems likely to impose hardships on those living inside

the zone, where cattle have been infected by wild elk wandering out of

the nearby national park.We must take care that these concerns are

addressed.

The Manitoba government has increased the number of elk that can be

hunted this season to reduce the area elk population by 1,000.

But more could be done. The federal government, which manages the elk

in the park, must develop a plan that specifically targets diseased

animals.

Setting up the new zone without taking all necessary steps to eradicate

the disease would accomplish little in the end. Elk from the park must

not be allowed to re-infect the area’s cattle after producers have

taken all measures they can to ensure their livestock is healthy.

Whatever plan the CFIA has, the U.S. will make its own decision on the

acceptance and testing of Canadian cattle.

However, we believe a new zone within Manitoba strikes a fair balance.

explore

Stories from our other publications