New U.S. farm bill a defeat for farmers – WP editorial

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 28, 2002

AMERICAN senators were mighty upset that their federal agriculture

secretary might have tried to enlist the help of a foreign government

to lobby against an overly rich U.S. farm bill.

Referring to reports that Ann Veneman encouraged Canadian agriculture

minister Lyle Vanclief to lobby Congress against high subsidies, some

angry senators wondered aloud about whose side Veneman was on.

But Congress should learn the farm bill it is now negotiating will

invite international condemnation, not just polite lobbying from Canada.

Read Also

An older male farmer holds a young, blonde child and points toward a red combine in a recently-harvested wheat field about 40 metres away.

Childhood memories of ‘magical’ combines last a lifetime

Combines are bigger, faster, more comfortable and more expensive. But I suspect one thing hasn’t changed for the kids riding in them: the thrill of climbing the stairs and entering that world.

Most in Congress now seem blind to the problems they are about to

create.

Senate agriculture committee chair Tom Harkin of Iowa called the bill

“a tremendous victory for the economy of rural America.”

This so-called victory is a defeat for farmers outside America who will

have to contend with price-depressing subsidized overproduction.

It is a defeat for those trying to rid agriculture of government

inspired market distortions.

It is even a defeat for American farmers who need fundamentally

different farm support to face the challenges of the 21st century.

While different in scope, the farm bills of both houses of Congress are

essentially a return to costly programs that have proven incapable of

ensuring a healthy rural society.

They support farmers’ income by enhancing prices for basic commodities

such as wheat, soybeans and corn.

This encourages American farmers to maximize returns by boosting

production and discourages them from exploring more sustainable,

market-based opportunities.

This creates surpluses that ensure grain prices stay low, generating

calls for even more farm aid.

To cope, farmers around the world plead with their own governments for

support programs.

It is a vicious circle.

American politicians must be congratulated for an apparently sincere

desire to help rural constituents. But someone must point out

forcefully the error of the way they are going about it.

Veneman and her boss, George Bush, have argued that farm bills are too

costly, especially the Senate version with its heavy spending over the

next five years. But they have not offered much in the way of a more

enlightened alternative.

It is time for America’s friends to act.

Canada, Australia, Brazil and the rest of the Cairns Group must tell

the U.S. that it can’t lecture others about farm programs while

shoveling new money into market-distorting policies at home.

If friendly words don’t work, actions might.

Brazil and Argentina are already preparing a World Trade Organization

challenge of the legality of American soybean subsidies.

Canada and other Cairns members have similar issues and should not be

afraid to act.

explore

Stories from our other publications