Quiche recipes, crochet a scarf
Dear TEAM: I have lost the recipe for a quiche made with Bisquick or a similar mix. It was similar to the Impossible Pie recipe as all the ingredients were mixed together and the crust settled to the bottom of the pan when cooked. The one I had called for diced ham and was so quick, easy and delicious.
Dear reader: I found two Bisquick Impossible Pie recipes for you. I have used the shrimp pie recipe and replaced the shrimp with one cup (250 mL) of diced ham.
Read Also
Worrisome drop in grain prices
Prices had been softening for most of the previous month, but heading into the Labour Day long weekend, the price drops were startling.
Impossible shrimp pie
1 package (6 oz.) frozen cooked 175 g
small shrimps, thawed
1Ú3 cup sliced 75 mL
green onions
1Ú2 teaspoon dried 2 mL
basil leaves
1 cup grated 250 mL
swiss cheese
1 1Ú2 cups milk 375 mL
3 eggs 3
3Ú4 cup Bisquick 175 mL
baking mix
1Ú2 teaspoon salt 2 mL
1Ú4 teaspoon pepper 1 mL
Heat oven to 400 F (200 C.) Grease 10 inch (25 cm) pie plate. Mix first four ingredients in plate. Beat remaining ingredients until smooth, 15 seconds in blender on high or one minute with hand beater. Pour into plate. Bake until knife inserted in centre comes out clean, 30 to 35 minutes. Cool five minutes. Serves six to eight.
Using the same instructions you can also make a garden vegetable impossible pie.
Impossible veggie pie
2 cups chopped 500 mL
zucchini
1 cup chopped 250 mL
tomato
1Ú2 cup chopped 125 mL
onion
1Ú3 cup parmesan 75 mL
cheese
11Ú2 cups milk 375 mL
3Ú4 cup Bisquick 175 mL
baking mix
3 eggs 3
1Ú2 teaspoon salt 2 mL
1Ú4 teaspoon pepper 1 mL
Bad trick
Dear TEAM: Could you tell me how to remove egg from windows and house siding? – D.R., Saskatoon, Sask.
Dear D.R.: Unfortunately at Halloween, there always seem to be a few eggs that end up on windows and siding. I contacted Brenda White, a home economist with the Alberta Egg Producers Board, and she provided these suggestions for cleaning off egg.
Windows – If possible, start by scraping off any egg. Wash windows with warm, soapy water using an enzyme-containing detergent to help dissolve the protein in the egg. Finish by using either a commercial window/glass cleaner or a homemade formula, such as 1Ú2 cup (125 mL) sudsy ammonia mixed with two cups (500 mL) rubbing alcohol and one tablespoon (15 mL) hand dish washing liquid, to get windows sparkling.
Exterior (wood) siding – Again, first scrape off any egg if possible, being careful not to damage the surface. Clean by using a warm soapy water solution, using an enzyme-containing detergent. Another option is to use the all-purpose cleaner, TSP (trisodium phosphate). Mix two to three tbsp. (30-45 mL) with four quarts (four liters) warm water, stir thoroughly and use rubber gloves when applying. If using TSP, it is best to test the solution on a small, less visible area of the siding to ensure it does not affect the paint.
Winter warmth
Dear TEAM: I am looking for a knitted scarf pattern that has one end that goes through a tunnel in the other end so it lies flat. – R.A. F., Ardmore, Alta.
Dear R.A.F.: I finally found this crocheted pattern for the type of scarf you are looking for. There was no source on the pattern so I’m not sure of its origin.
Neat neck scarf
Materials:
- 2 oz. sport-weight yarn
- Crochet hook size F (8)
Gauge: 5 sc = 1″, 7 rows worked in back loops =1 1/2″
ROW 1: Ch 2, work 3 sc in 2nd ch from hook, ch 1, turn
ROW 2: Sc in 1st st, 2 sc in next, 1 sc in last st, ch 1, turn
ROW 3: 2 sc in 1st st, ch 3, sk 2 sc, 2 sc in last st, ch 1, turn
ROW 4: 1 sc in each next 2 sts, ch 2, 1 sc in ch 3 sp, ch 2, 1 sc in each last 2 sts, ch 1,turn
ROW 5: 1 sc in each next 2 sts, ch 2, 2 sc in next st, ch 2, 1 sc in each last 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROW 6: 1 sc in each next 2 sts, ch 2, 2 sc in each of next 2 sts, ch 2, 1 sc in each of last 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROW 7: 1 sc in each of next 2 sts, ch 2, 2 sc in next sc, 1 sc in each sc up to last sc before next ch 2 sp, 2 sc in this sc, ch 2, 1 sc in each of last 2 sc, ch 1, turn.
ROW 8-13: Repeat Row 7, having 18 sc between ch 2 spaces at end of Row 13.
ROW 14: Sc in next 2 sc, ch 2, sc in each sc across up to ch 2 sp, ch 2, sc in last 2 sc, ch 1, turn
ROW 15 -27: Repeat Row 14
ROW 28: Sc in next 2 sc, ch 2, dec over next 2 sc, sc across up to last 2 sc before ch 2 sp, dec over these 2 sc, ch 2, sc in last 2 sc, ch 1, turn
ROW 29: Repeat Row 28.
ROW 30: Sc in next 2 sc, ch 2, dec over next 2 sc, sc across to next ch 2, ch 2, sc in next 2 sc, ch 1, turn
ROW 31-42: Repeat Row 30 until just 1 sc remains between each ch 2
ROW 43: Sc across, making 1 sc in each ch 2 sp, ch 1, turn. (7sc)
Tab
Make 1 sc in each sc (ch 1 counts as 1st sc), ch 1, turn. Repeat this row 6 more times.
Neck section
Work in back loops only.
ROW 1: Sc in same place as ch 1. *sc in next sc, 2 sc in next sc, rep from o across, ch 1, turn. (14 sc)
Row 2: Sc across, ch 1, turn
Repeat Rows 1 and 2, 2 more times. (31 sc)
ROW 7: Sc across, ch 1, turn
Repeat Row 7 until piece measures 15″ from 1 st row of neck section.
NEXT ROW: o Dec over next 2 sts, sc in next, repeat from o across row, ch 1, turn
NEXT ROW: Sc evenly across row, ch 1, turn
Repeat these dec rows 2 more times
Tab
ROW 1: Sc across, working in back loops only, ch 1, turn
ROW 2: Sc across (work through both loops), ch 1, turn
Repeat Row 2 for 8 more times,
fasten off yarn.
Attach yarn in the 1st st of row 1 of tab, working in front loops that are
remaining where you previously worked in the back loops, sc across, ch 1, turn
NEXT ROW: Sc evenly across row (work through both loops), ch 1, turn. Repeat this row for 8 more rows.
NEXT ROW: Sc across working through both pieces of tab, ch 1, turn
End piece
ROW 1: Sc in 2 sc, ch 2, sk 2 sts, 1 sc in next st, ch 2, sk 2 sts, sc in last 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROW 2: Sc in 2 sts, ch 2, 2 sc in next sc, ch 2, sc in last 2 sc, ch 1, turn
ROW 3: Sc in 2 sts, ch 2, 2 sc in next sc, sc in each sc up to next ch 2 sp, ch 2, sc in next 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROWS 4 -13: Repeat Row 3
ROW 14: Sc in 2 sts, ch 2, 2 sc in next sc, sc across to last sc before the next ch – 2 sp and make 2 sc in this st, ch 2, sc in last 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROW 15: Repeat Row 14 once more. (18 sc)
ROW 16: Sc in 1st 2 sts, ch 2, sc across to ch – 2 sp, ch 2, sc in last 2 sc’s, ch 1, turn
ROWS 17-29: Repeat Row 16
ROW 30: Sc in 2 sts, ch 2, dec over next 2 sts, sc across up to last 2 sts
before next ch 2 – sp and make a dec over these 2 sts, ch 2, sc in last 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROWS 31-37: Repeat Row 30
ROW 38: Sc in 2 sts, ch 2, dec over 2 sts, ch 2, sc in next 2 sts, ch 1, turn
ROW 39: Sc in next 2 sts, ch 1, sc in 2 sts, ch 1, turn.
ROW 40: Sk 1 sc draw up a loop in next sc, sk 1, draw up a loop in last sc, yo and draw through all loops on hook, ch 1 to close, fasten off.
SPECIAL SECTION
Canadian wheat board candidates
Profiling the candidates
For this special pullout section, Western Producer staff sought to compile a set of basic information about each candidate in the Canadian Wheat Board director election. In a few cases, a candidate could not be reached and we had to rely on material the candidate filed with the election co-ordinator.
In addition to questions on type of farming operation, number of years farming, other experience and education, candidates were asked four policy questions:
Export monopoly
Would they like to see the CWB’s export monopoly continue?
Payment options
Should farmers have the option of taking payment in full at time of delivery, by selling or otherwise giving up right to interim and final payments?
Car allocation
Should the CWB maintain its role in rail car allocation or just take delivery at port?
Openness
Do they think the board has in the past been sufficiently open and candid with farmers or should more detailed information on things like grain sales, finances and salaries be made public?
Candidates were also invited to comment on other policy positions they would like to note, and to describe any business management skills and principles they would bring to the role of director.
District #1
TOM JACKSON
22433 Twp Road 534, Ardrossan, Alta., T8E 2L8, 403-922-3476.
Produces pedigreed wheat, creeping red fescue and timothy seed, pulses and canola; raises 100 horses on 4,000 acres. Also supplies three million pounds of wheat straw to a local mushroom factory.
Age 39. Farming 24 years.
Has been credited with creating the Jackson Offset, part of the GRIP safety net program. Involved with the Canadian Grain Commission licensing and security of specialty crops. Member of the Oilseeds and Special Crops steering committee, treasurer of the Alberta Agricultural Forum, commissioner for the Alberta Pulse Growers Commission, secretary of Alberta Market Choice Implementation Group and Alberta Safety Nets Coalition member.
Has taken leadership training courses provided by Alberta Agriculture and Canadian International Grains Institute. Received a 20-year long-service award from the Canadian Seed Growers Association.
Monopoly: Canadian Wheat Board’s export monopoly issue is irrelevant and should take a back seat to developing a good cash system.
Payment options: Farmers should have the right to cash and pre-price grain.
Car allocation: There needs to be a fair and equitable rail car bidding system by the board to try and get the most efficient delivery system to farmers.
Openness: On past board secrecy, believes the board didn’t have much choice because of government regulation, but in the future would like to see an open and transparent system.
His biggest concern is the polarization of the grain debate in Western Canada.
Business approach: Business skills he will bring to the board will ensure the directors follow a parliamentary system of motions, debates and full discussion.
ART MACKLIN
10242-111 Ave., Grande Prairie, Alta., T8V 1T8, 403-532-0677
Produces wheat, barley, timothy and clovers on 1,200 acres. Raises cattle on 2,240 acres of bush pasture. Owns 900 acres of undeveloped bush.
Age, 53. Farming 36 years.
Active in several local co-ops, including gas and forage seed co-ops, past president of the National Farmers Union, current chair of the Canadian Wheat Board advisory committee, which he has belonged to for 12 years. Received a Canadian Seed Growers Association 25-year certificate.
Involved in the local United Church and its committees.
Attended agricultural courses at the University of Alberta, taken numerous Canadian International Grain Institute courses and travelled internationally to gain understanding of world agriculture.
Monopoly: It is absolutely critical the export monopoly continue.
Payment options: Wheat board would have to discount farmers who took immediate full payment. A better option may be to allow producers to take out a low-interest loan against the value of the final payment and have loan retired by the final payment.
Car allocation: It’s vital the wheat board maintain a meaningful role in handling and transportation.
Openness: The board has been more open than other grain companies in sales and financial information.
He would like to see more openness in policy issues.
He said it’s critical the wheat board be competently managed. It must be open to new options, but not at the expense of single-desk selling and price pooling.
Business approach: Skills brought to the agency would be substantial experience in managing the affairs of the NFU, operating his own farm successfully for many years and 12 years on advisory committee.
ALBERT J. WAGNER
R.R. # 1 Duffield, Alta., T0E 0N0 403-963-7753
Owns 1,500 acres, rents another 500. Produces canola, barley, wheat, peas, beef cattle.
Age 50. Farming 33 years.
President of Muir Lake Community League, former CN Rail employee including superintendent of transportation for Edmonton and Alberta.
Monopoly: Does not want to see the wheat board’s export monopoly continue, favors dual-desk selling.
Payment options: Believes producers should have a number of payment options at delivery, including a full cash payout if they choose.
Car allocation: Said someone must be involved in railcar allocation in order to provide the greatest efficiencies to farmers. The wheat board may be able to play a leadership role in car allocation.
Openness: The wheat board needs to become more public. There is a cloud of secrecy over the board which has created suspicion.
Would like to see the wheat board change to reflect modern farming times. Doesn’t believe it can protect farmers from oversupply or price swings, but it’s not allowing farmers to take full advantage of upside prices either.
The wheat board should provide a leadership role in sales to large volume customers, new and emerging markets and have a leadership role in transportation and distribution needs.
Doesn’t feel the board is using its power at the ports to get the best price, but instead is maintaining the status quo.
Business approach: His management style is a co-operative one.
Everyone needs to work together to create a better understanding of needs, including customers, supplies of transportation, competitors and allies in an effort to fulfill sales and promote marketing of western producers’ grain.
District #2
THOMAS L. ADAMS
Box 211, Duchess, Alta. T0J 0Z0, 403-378-4119
Operates 3,000-acre family farm, about half rented. Dryland and irrigation farming producing wheat, barley, peas, oilseeds, forages and beef cattle.
Age 39. Farming 24 years.
Would bring his experience helping to run the family farm to the board and his knowledge from following the debate for many years. Has also coached hockey.
Monopoly: Does not want to see the board continue as a monopoly.
Payment options: Farmers should have the right to sell their grain when they deliver. Hates telling farmers what they should do.
Car allocation: Prefers wheat board take control of grain at port but acknowledges it has a role to play in transportation.
Openness: The board is too secretive. Says all information should be available to farmers.
Primary goal is to find a solution to debate among open-market and pro-wheat board farmers. The long-running debate has hampered agriculture policies in western Canada. He is not adamantly against the wheat board and feels pooling has a role in Western Canada.
Other comments: Was enticed to enter because this is the first time in 50 years farmers have a chance to democratically elect farmers to their own marketing board.
Business approach: As a director would work with other open-minded people to find solutions to grain politics that are hampering farmers. Promises to bring honesty to the debate and stand up for farmers’ rights before anything else.
STEVEN BOTHI
Box 425, Bassano, Alta., T0J 0B0, 403-641-3688
Produces cereals, oilseeds and pulse crops on 2,500 owned acres.
Age 47. Farming 26 years.
Bothi is a former Alberta Wheat Pool delegate, which included being chair of the B.C. AWP transportation committee, Unifarm, Bassano Ag Society, Bassano Gas Co-op and chair of the Alberta Pro-CWB group.
Has taken University of Alberta Bachelor of Arts courses and a management restructuring course with the pool.
Monopoly: He would like to see the wheat board’s export monopoly continue.
Payment options: There are a number of different payment options available if there is enough demand, but insisted it is still key to maintain single-desk selling.
Car allocation: The wheat board should maintain a role in transportation. The wheat board is connecting the end user to the farm and is in the best position to meet the requirements of buyers. Breaking it down to an inland system will satisfy grain companies and railways, but not necessarily farmers.
Openness: While the wheat board has always published audited financial statements, he suggested publishing information in a more readable form. Some sales information is the property of the customer and should not be made public.
He is committed to the control and accountability side of the board. The first board of directors must let it be known they have come in to run the organization, he said. Committed to working with three advisory committees in district to ensure an information flow to help break down the secrecy of the board.
Business approach: His involvement with the pool and different community organizations has taught him the importance of putting good systems in place to help an agency work. As a successful farmer can bring skills to the board.
JAMES F. CHATENAY
R.R.#4 Red Deer, Alta. T4N 5E4; 403-886-4632
Owns 480 acres, rents 640. Produces wheat, barley, canola, peas.
Age 55. Farming 35 years.
Involved with the Alberta Charolais Association, 4-H, curling club and as hockey coach.
Monopoly: Does not want the wheat board export monopoly to continue. He feels it’s not working now.
Payment options: Initial payments are ridiculously low and final payments have been microscopic. Believes the board should be voluntary and competitive. If it wants his business, it will offer him the highest price.
Car allocation: Has no position on rail car allocation but will consider after structural board changes are made.
Openness: Says the wheat board has been too secretive. In the Charolais business, producers love talking about prices received for bulls, and those who don’t reveal prices are considered to have something to hide. People often hide behind customer pricing protection.
Other comments: It’s important for the board to be voluntary and competitive. It is now a huge monster, out of control, that farmers can no longer afford. Said the first action should be to see what areas can be cut. Wants the board to be more competitive and accountable.
Business approach: Believes in the keep it smple stupid program. Bureaucrats love to do everything except keep things simple. Is worried the democratic process is eroding.
BRUCE McARTHUR
Box 664, Trochu, Alta., TOM 2C0; 403-442-2589
Produces wheat, peas, barley and canola on 3,500 leased acres.
Age 39. Farming for 12 years.
Graduated from high school, community involvement includes sitting on his local wheat pool committee.
Monopoly: Supports the concept of the wheat board but wants changes. He believes a producer should have the ability to export grain, but grain agencies should not be allowed to export because they are competing against the board and the individual farmer.
“If a producer thinks he can do a better job, he can try.”
Payment options: Farmers should have the option to accept cash payments upon delivery and they should be able to lock in a future price. However, doesn’t think accepting an early payment is of much benefit because the board is not going to pay more on the spot.
Car allocation: Believes the wheat board should bear some of the responsibility for shipping problems experienced in the past but isn’t sure if taking grain at the port is the solution either.
Openness: The wheat board’s financial matters could be more open. The board doesn’t need to be totally open about prices obtained from various clients, but finances dealing with administration and salaries should be open: “We’re paying them.”
Business approach: Since he rents his entire farm, he has learned to approach agriculture as a business. The wheat board’s affairs should be run as a business as well.
“You have to make money or you’re not going to be in the game very long.”
GORDON NELSON
Box 95, Milo, Alta., TOL 1L0; 403-534-2241
Produces barley, wheat, durum and canola on 2.5 sections. One section is owned and 1.5 leased. Also has a commercial cattle herd.
Age 35 years. Farming all his life.
Board member of the Milo Seed Cleaning Association and the Northwest Fire Protection Association; member of the Marquis Marketing Group.
Completed Grade 12 and served an apprenticeship as an auto mechanic. He ran an auto repair business for eight years.
Monopoly: Supports a dual domestic market but wants more information on opening the market internationally.
Payment options: Farmers should not be allowed to take payment in full when they deliver their grain. Those who receive cash payments lower the pool for others.
Car allocation: The wheat board should take delivery at the port. It should sign contracts with grain companies and if they don’t deliver, extract penalties.
“It is a marketing agency, not a transportation agency.”
Openness: The board has been too secretive about sales from the past.
He understands the need to keep current sales confidential but the auditor general should have full access to check on board practices.
Business approach: As an elected board member, believes the board should set general policies while the wheat board staff handles the day to day work of sales, market analysis and contracts.
“We’re there to make sure the farmer is taken care of.”
He also wants more open communication with farmers in the district so board members don’t become too remote from their constituents.
This can be done with open meetings in the country to talk with as many people as possible.
District #3
COLLEEN BIANCHI
R.R. 2, Coutts, Alta., TOK ONO; 403-344-4473
Produces barley, durum, canola and mustard on 2,700 acres; 1,600 acres are owned. Recently switched from cow/calf production to backgrounding yearlings.
Age 43.
Active in her community, helped organize a local school council, serves in the Catholic Women’s League, has been a member of the Alberta Women’s Institute for 21 years and a member of the Alberta Farm Women’s Network for three years.
She and her husband are also involved in a recently formed grassroots organization for Alberta and Montana producers who meet to learn about each other’s farming systems.
Graduated from high school, and is the farm bookkeeper and oversees the financial management of the family farm.
Monopoly: Board should not continue as a monopoly. While she believes the board has 50 years of expertise dealing in the international grain trade, farmers should have the right to opt out of the board and pursue their own markets which may include developing value added products with their own grain.
“If someone can find a niche, they should be able to pursue it.”
Payment options: Farmers should have the right to make their own choices. If they prefer to accept cash payments on delivery, they should have that option.
Openness: Her main concern with the board and its operations is accountability to farmers. Much better communication is needed to tell farmers what is happening as well as asking farmers what they want on some of the larger issues.
“It is our dollars involved and producers aren’t aware of what is going on.”
DAN CUTFORTH
Box 22, Barons, Alta. TOL 0G0; 403-757-3860
Produces durum, canola, hard spring wheat and barley, and raises cattle, on 3,500 acres.
Age 44.
Graduated from high school and is a licensed welder.
Involvement in the grain industry is broad. He has been a member of the wheat board advisory committee for 12 years and sits on the Alberta Grain Commission. Past director of the Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association. Active in his community in service clubs, minor sports coaching and is secretary treasurer of the Whitelake Water Co-op.
Monopoly: Interested in pursuing an open domestic market for wheat and later looking at opening up the international monopoly.
“An open domestic feed barley market has done wonders for southern Alberta.”
Believes a voluntary wheat board deserves consideration.
He does not want additional grains or canola brought under the jurisdiction of the wheat board.
Payment options: If farmers want to accept cash payments for their grain, the option should be there, but producers need to realize they will likely receive a discounted price.
Car allocation: Transportation costs are the highest expense for prairie farmers but he wants more information on what benefits there are in the wheat board’s continued involvement in rail car allocation.
Openness: As a member of the advisory committee, he had access to more information than the average farmer.
The board was sufficiently open about business deals and as a business the board should not release grain prices to the public.
“The farmer directors should have access to this information. The farmers will have to elect people they trust.”
RICK JENSEN
Box 88, Webb, Sask., SON 2X0; 306-674-2312
Produces durum, barley, peas, wheat and mustard, and raises 60 commercial cows on 11 quarters, of which half is leased from the government.
Age 49. Farming 29 years.
Has two years of university which includes some business and accounting training.
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool delegate for 14 years and secretary manager of the Southwest Forage Co-operative Association. He is also a member of his local Elks lodge.
Monopoly: Believes the board should keep its export monopoly.
Payment options: Isn’t sure about cash payments at the time of delivery and feels at this time it is an option that should be left up to the farmers. However, there is a danger of drawing down the pool account for others.
Car allocation: The board should retain its role in car allocations.
“It’s the only way I can see it getting the grain it needs.”
Openness: The board must become more open. “The board must explain to farmers better what grains are needed and what the customers want. You have to provide what the customers want or you’re not going to sell it.”
Wants the board to be strengthened as a farmers’ organization and wants to pursue improved communication.
“The board has to have better two-way communication with farmers to let them know what grain they should be producing.”
LARRY HILL
Box 1014, Swift Current, Sask., S9H 3X1; 306-778-2359
Produces durum, hard red spring wheat, barley, lentils, peas, canola and mustard on 33 quarters. Owns all but three quarters.
Age 54. Farming fulltime for 17 years.
Previously was an engineer with the conservation development branch for the Saskatchewan government. He has an engineering degree and recently graduated with top class honors from the University of Saskatchewan’s certificate in farm business management program.
He has been involved with credit unions for years, serving as a board director and chair. He is also on the board for the Cypress Hills Regional College and sat on local wheat pool committees.
Monopoly: Strong wheat board supporter and wants the agency to continue operating as a monopoly both domestically and internationally.
Payment options: Willing to allow cash payments upon delivery if the farm’s business plan warrants it.
Car allocation: Favors the board’s involvement in rail car allocation.
Openness: Feels the board must maintain confidentiality to remain effective and to protect clients as well as have the ability to price grain differently at different places.
“Producers should elect people they trust so they know the prices negotiated are fair.”
Feels he offers management skills and a willingness to learn as well as a strong desire to protect the board to make it the best it can be.
“The wheat board is very important to farmers. This is the chance for farmers to take a more active role in this entity.
“If the farmers don’t support the wheat board, it won’t survive.”
BILL KAUPP
General Delivery, New Dayton, Alta.; T0K 1P0, 403-733-2379
Produces cereals and canola, and raises 30 cows on 4,200 acres, half of which are rented. For 16 years until spring 1998, operated a farm in Montana.
Age 45. Farming 26 years.
He spent one year at university.
Monopoly: Does not support the continued export monopoly of the CWB. “I do support the wheat board, but I think it should run from a position that farmers want to sell to the wheat board and shouldn’t be forced.”
Payment options: Believes farmers should be able to sell on the futures market when prices are high. “The wheat board definitely has to get involved in (that).”
Car allocation: Taking delivery at port might be a good option. The board should monitor CN and CP Rail very closely due to the monopoly each has in some areas and the “mess” of two winters ago.
Openness: Supports a more open wheat board. “I understand reasons why you don’t want to release agreements. As an elected director I would certainly release things that don’t matter.”
Thinks maybe all Canadian farmers should use the board. “Through its name it does give an inference that it rules all Canadian farmers. Maybe the CWB should be the marketer throughout Canada so that Ontario farmers or farmers from Quebec and B.C. farm under the same rules and regulations.”
He believes farming in Montana helped him see the grain industry from different perspectives.
BOB STENHOUSE
#10 – 2492 Southview Drive, Medicine Hat, Alta., T1B 1C8; 403-527-4311
Produces cereals, mainly durum, and specialty crops like coriander on 2,000 owned acres and additional rented land.
Age 53. Farmed all his adult life.
Educated at University of Calgary in business administration. Owns his own business.
He has served on three major public corporations as a director, including chief financial officer and director of Aace Environmental Services, a $20-million corporation.
Monopoly: Unsure about continuation of export monopoly without having more information. “I don’t believe in the dismantling or the annihilation of the Canadian Wheat Board, but it must be flexible enough to analyze all of the marketing alternatives.”
Payment options: Supports quicker payment to producers, and believes the length of time producers must wait between initial and final payments is due to lack of accountability.
Car allocation: He said a bigger issue than the export monopoly is handling and transportation. Believes the board has a definite role in both those areas.
Openness: He believes accountability must improve. He said the board has been candid and open enough with government, but not with producers. “We have never had the ability to look into the wheat board and understand and analyze. In all areas of accountability they have fallen short.”
Business approach: His strong farming background combined with business and financial experience makes him a perfect candidate for a wheat board director.
“Most of my constituents, to their credit, have served on local community boards, pool committees and small financial co-operatives. However, we must recognize that the CWB is a $7 billion corporation that requires the expertise of someone with large corporate experience in marketing, financial planning, budget development and policy making.”
MORGAN ROCKENBACH
Box 118, Wrentham, Alta., T0K 2P0; 403-222-2409
Grows cereals and oilseeds on 320 acres. Employed off the farm at Case IH dealership in Taber.
Age 49. Farming 23 years.
Graduated with degree, diploma or certificate in medical technology, education, animal health technology and the agriculture service industry.
Active in community groups: Wrentham recreation board and school advisory committee, Ridge Reservoir Water Association, and Conservation 2000-Wrentham Flex croppers.
Monopoly: “I would prefer to see a Canadian Wheat Board there. It must exist but at the same time it needs to be flexible.
“I don’t particularly agree that they should have a total monopoly.”
Car allocation: He supports a board role in grain transportation, although with some changes.
Openness: The board needs to be more open and accountable. Many farmers believe they haven’t been told the whole story about the board’s financial matters. “Many questions about the entire grain marketing system often go unanswered and resolutions to situations that farmers view as problem areas are not resolved satisfactorily.”
Believes the board should be run by experienced farmers who are open-minded, receptive to new ideas and flexible enough to implement policies that allow farmers marketing choices.
Business approach: Policy-making is a skill one must learn, and he has done that through his years of community involvement. “My background in policy-making is an adequate base to start from. And, I am able to relate well to the public and farmers particularly.”
RAY TAYLOR
R.R. #8 18-5, Lethbridge, Alta., T1J 4P4; 403-327-9245
Produces canola, barley, spring wheat and durum on 7,000 owned acres and 25,000 rented acres.
Age 49. Farming for more than 30 years.
Studied agricultural technology at Lethbridge Community College.
Since 1980, has operated a 16-combine custom harvesting operation from Lethbridge to Texas.
Member of the Canadian Custom Harvesting Association.
Monopoly: The board’s export monopoly should “absolutely not” continue, adding the board is not accountable because farmers don’t have the choice of exporting on their own.
Payment options: Agreed farmers should be able to get full payment when they deliver their grain.
Car allocation: Does not support board involvement in rail car allocation. “They do such a bad job at everything I feel they should have no role in transportation at all.”
Other policy comments: “My vision for the CWB is to become a private grain company just like everybody else. Even our permit book system should be scrapped.” The board could do this by purchasing other companies’ assets.
Other changes have worked to producers’ advantage. When the Crow Benefit was scrapped, value-added in his area really took off. “It’s been beautiful to see the ag businesses that have sprung up. They don’t relate much to wheat and barley. Value-added would flourish if the wheat board did not have control.”
Business approach: His good business sense would make him a good wheat board director.
District #4
ALAN FISCHER
(This profile was not based on an interview because the candidate could not be reached for comment. Rather, it was compiled using information the candidate filed with KPMG.)
Box 147, Luseland, Sask., S0L 2A0, 306-834-2684
Produces grain and raises cattle on 3,480 acres.
Age 29.
Participated in an agricultural exchange to Australia in 1989.
Monopoly: Interested in a simple, accountable, farmer-directed single-desk wheat board.
He said he cares about stability of farmers and rural communities.
It should be more difficult for rail lines and elevators to be abandoned, suggesting an “infrastructure abandonment tax” could be implemented. Also suggested that perhaps the Canadian Wheat Board could run a short-line railway to the West Coast.
Believes grain producers need to stick together. No one farmer fills a ship at the West Coast and no one farmer makes sales overseas.
JIM ROBBINS
Box 89, Delisle, Sask. S0L 0P0; 306-493-2569
Produces cereal, oilseeds, pulse and forage crops, and has a 40-head cow/calf herd, on 2,440 acres, 960 of which are rented.
Age 49. Farming 21 years.
Has B.Sc. Arts, B.Sc. Ag. and a M.Sc. Ag degrees and has worked as a microbiologist research technician and as an animal science instructor at the University of Saskatchewan’s vocation agriculture program.
He acts as consultant to the Credit Union Central and the Canadian Co-operatives Association on issues surrounding board governance, strategic planning and CEO evaluation.
He is a board member of the Delisle Credit Union and is its delegate to Credit Union Central.
Previously he was an elected farmer member of the Senior Grain Transportation Committee, producer representative and technical committee member of the Car Allocation Policy Group and former farmer representative of the National Crop Insurance Review Program.
Monopoly: Believes in the single desk, price pooling option for producers.
Payment options: Feels that some reform of the system to provide early payment may be possible if it does not threaten the viability of pool accounts.
Openness: Secrecy is part of effective grain trading but looking at historical contracts should be acceptable.
“More communication to farmers about issues such as problems associated with wide spread port tendering contracts are the type of areas where I can play a role for my fellow producers.”
Business approach: His experience working on transportation issues, knowledge of directorships and strategic positioning make him a strong candidate for the position of director.
RAY RYLAND
Box 84, Plato,Sask. S0L 2P0; 306-962-4363
Owns 1,120 acres, 640 leased. Produces cereal grains, oilseeds, specialty crops.
Age 50. Farming 15 years.
Current director and president, since 1993, of Prairie Creek Credit Union. Former director of Eston Credit Union 1986-93. Delegate to the Credit Union Central 1994 to present. Director of Value Added Industries of Rosetown, Sask.; Saskatchewan Wheat Pool delegate 1985-93. Has B.Sc in agriculture.
Spent 13 years working for Sask Pool and for the provincial government in agricultural policy, marketing and operations.
Monopoly: Feels the single-desk selling and price pooling system benefits farmers and hopes to increase communication with farmers about activities of the CWB.
Payment options: Says all marketing options must be considered by the new board and any measure to improve producer payments shouldn’t threaten the integrity of the board’s principles, including price pooling.
Openness: “Some aspects of the board’s marketing efforts are secret. They have to be. They are already far more open than the grain trade.”
Other comments: Intends to undertake and maintain greater communication with fellow producers and increased emphasis on providing marketing information.
Business approach: To give direction and see that the proper people have what they need to do their jobs. Skills in working with boards of directors, education and experience from operating a farm are assets to his credit in seeking position on the board.
KEN RITTER
(This profile was not based on an interview because the candidate could not be reached for comment. Rather, it was compiled using information the candidate filed with KPMG.)
207 – 9 West Road, Kindersley, Sask., S0L 1S1; 306-463-4726
Operates family farm in Major-Superb area.
Has practised law in Kindersley, and taught in Marengo, Sask., and Port Lincoln, South Australia.
Former National Transportation Agency commissioner (1989-94). Past chair of Saskatchewan Surface Rights Arbitration Board. Worked on design and implementation of Saskatchewan Farm Security Act.
Monopoly: Supports dual marketing. “The long term future of the board depends upon the voluntary allegiance of farmers and the board’s ability to compete better at home and abroad.”
Believes dual marketing and a competitive board will provide better economic returns and more accountability than a monopoly.
Openness: Says directors should be accountable for their costs and expenditures, the costs of board operations and the prices achieved by the board.
“I will examine the prices achieved by the board and I will demand that those prices are at least equal to or are better than the private grain trade.”
Believes the statutory freight rate cap should remain in place.
Business approach: Says practical farming experience, along with professional background, will make him effective, accountable and knowledgeable director.
“The time I spent as a commissioner for the National Transportation Agency of Canada has given me a unique understanding of how all grains are transported from country elevators to Canadian ports.”
BILL ROSHER
Box 45, Smiley, Sask, S0L 2Z0, 306-463-6695
Produces cereals, pulses and oilseeds on 1500 acres.
Age 39. Farming 12 years.
Has a B.Sc. of Ag. He spent three years in the military prior to entering university.
Rosher has been a member of the Canadian Wheat Board advisory committee, a former local Saskatchewan Wheat Pool committee secretary and sits as a board member and secretary of the Saskatchewan Federation of Production Co-operatives.
Monopoly: “We need to work together for our farming communities. Grain pooling is one method that we can use. We will need to remain flexible and adapt the board to meet change though.”
Payment options: Feels that cash purchasing tears down the pooling system but that creative ways can be found to make changes that aid producer cash flow.
Car allocation: Board needs to negotiate, on behalf of producers, a moratorium on elevator closure, demolition and railway abandonment as soon as possible.
“Then we need to develop a least-cost system that will take grain from field to road to rail to port and implement it.”
Openness: “The board needs to maintain some privacy between itself and its customers. Between the board and the producer it must be fully open.”
Feels his experience as an elected member of the advisory board and as an ordinary farmer makes him an ideal candidate for director.
District #5
DAVE POWLEY
61 Manor Drive, Sherwood Park, Alta., T8A 0P9; 403-467-9021
Produces wheat, barley and canola on 320 acres.
Age 58. Farming 30 years.
Teacher for 35 years, while he was also involved in administration. He received a Bachelor of Arts in 1962 and a Masters of Education in 1972, both degrees from the University of Alberta.
Monopoly: Supports the CWB’s monopoly because he thinks it presently puts the most money into producers’ pockets.
Changing the monopoly “can be looked at, but at the moment the collective returns for farmers are the best.”
Payment options: Believes the wheat board should consider giving farmers the option of taking cash payment at delivery. However, the board would have to make sure this did not hurt the majority of farmers who stay in the price pool.
He doesn’t think it’s fair to take money out of the price pools to set up a contingency fund to cover shortfalls from cash-buying. “It’s good to have flexibility, but who bears the cost?”
Car allocation: CWB should stay involved with rail car allocation until farmers can be guaranteed that grain shipments will receive good treatment from the railways. He is eagerly awaiting the Estey Review’s recommendations. “Farmers need to have a say in how grain transportation operates.”
Openness: Questions the allegation that the wheat board is overly secretive.
He said it should always try to improve its communications, and it needs to be more transparent and clear about its sales, but in recent years it has been doing a good job of reaching out to producers.
GREG POROZNI
5314 59A Avenue, Vegreville, Alberta, T9C 1J4; 403-632-7900
Farms 3,600 acres with his wife and parents. Produces cereals, oilseeds and peas. Family has 120-cow commercial herd.
Age 38. Farming 18 years.
Graduated from NAIT as petroleum technician and worked in the oilfield before farming.
Director of the Alberta Canola Producers Commission. Former UGG delegate.
Monopoly: Does not agree with the Canadian Wheat Board’s export monopoly, thinks marketing through the board should be voluntary.
Says a voluntary wheat board should cover all commodities, so farmers who like price pooling can market all crops through the board. “I think it can work.”
Payment options: Supports the board investigating option of payment in full upon delivery.
Car allocation: Board should reduce its role in grain transportation. It should pull grain to the ports by making delivery contracts with grain companies and railroads, and take control at ports. It shouldn’t be involved in organizing prairie grain trains. “I think they still have to be involved, but they should have a lesser role.”
Openness: Says board should be more open with producers, and share more financial details. “When you’re accountable, you have to open up the books.”
Other comments: The board should use hedging and futures more aggressively. Farmers want to protect against losses and get the benefits of rising prices.
Business approach: “I don’t have any ideologies. I would just try to make money for the farmer.”
RICHARD HAYDU
Box 73, Paradise Valley, Alta., T0B 3R0, 403-745-2371.
Produces wheat, barley, canola, peas and
canaryseed on 1,200 acres.
Age 50. Farming full-time 26 years.
He received a technician’s diploma from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology before beginning farming.
Has been involved in many organizations, including the local rural electrification association, the United Farmers of Alberta, Unifarm as a director, the Alberta Wheat Pool advisory committee and chair of the Battle River Seed Cleaning Co-operative. He was a pool delegate for nine years, including being on a committee to help the company restructure its operations. Says this experience will help him run a business such as the Canadian Wheat Board.
Monopoly: Supports the wheat board’s export monopoly.
Payment options: Does not support giving producers the option of receiving a full cash price on delivery. He said the wheat board must be a seller, not a buyer.
If it becomes a buyer, farmers could be hurt. “You begin treating farmers differently. The board needs equity and fairness.”
Car allocation: Wants the wheat board to stay involved in rail car allocation. The most important part of marketing is transportation, and the wheat board would have trouble serving farmers if it was not able to oversee grain shipments from the Prairies.
“We have to have a coordinator, and I think the Canadian Wheat Board is best fit to represent farmers.”
Openness: The wheat board should always try to do a better job at communicating to farmers, but believes it has become much better in recent years.
He thinks the first board of directors needs to make sure farmers get some power in the marketplace.
“We’re a group of farmers who are merging, just like the multinationals.
“It’s imperative farmers start working together.”
BOB GUEST
Box 42, Denholm, Sask; 306-445-5531
Operates mixed farm with 1120 acres owned, 960 acres leased. Produces canola, peas, flax, barley, durum and spring wheats, also has 50-head cow/calf operation and 22 Quarter horses.
Age 46. Farming 31 years.
Member of provincial Agriculture Employment Advisory Board for six years. Representative for northwest region for the Disabled Farmers Association. Board member of the Saskatchewan Labor Farm Safety Council for two years. Member of Saskatchewan Agriculture Community Training Advisory Coalition. Founder of the Denholm Marketing Club.
Monopoly: Believes in a strong CWB that pools grain and acts on behalf of farmers to achieve the best possible marketing options. But CWB mandate must be examined and changed to better address needs of modern producers.
Car allocation: “The board needs to control car allocation.
Penalties for poor performance in the grain handling system are not the fault of the farmer. Why should the farmer have to pay them?”
Openness: “The board needs some secrecy to be competitive, but it should be open to producers much as possible, so this needs some change. We have seen what the grain companies and the railways can do to us. A strong board is a strong advocate of the farmer.”
Other comments: Suggests reform on the issue of malt barley marketing and trade is needed.
Business approach: Says 30 years of farming, “through some real tough times in agriculture” and his experience with boards of directors, government and disabled farmers combine to make him a strong candidate.
JOHN CLAIR
Box 244, Radisson, Sask., S0K 3L0; 306-827-2234
Produces wheat, barley, canola, peas, durum on 1,280 owned acres and 1,720 operated through family, leasing or other arrangements.
Age 51. Farming 24 years.
Canadian Wheat Board advisory committee member since 1991 and since 1994 has been a director of the Western Grains Research Foundation. He is also a director of the Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association. From 1987-95 Was a delegate to Saskatchewan Wheat Pool. He was a member of the local school board for 14 years, 12 years with the local co-op board, a 4-H leader for seven years and for two years regional 4-H president.
For six years prior to farming he managed a steel fabrication business.
Monopoly: Single-desk selling and the price pooling system benefits farmers and should be continued.
Payment options: Earlier payment options should be examined and an interest free loan or payment certificate program for March or April would improve producer cash flow.
Car allocation: Control of transportation is important to the success of the system. He wants to work toward performance penalties for those who fail the farmer in transportation.
Openness: The board is not secretive and is more transparent than many producers realize, but that some aspects of this could be improved.
Business approach: His work on the advisory committee has prepared him for a directorship and his record of bringing farmer needs forward at the wheat board speaks for itself.
“We need farmers on the board to ensure its future direction meets the needs of producers into the future.”
MARV ANDERSON
(This profile was not based on an interview because the candidate could not be reached for comment. Rather, it was compiled using information the candidate filed with KPMG.)
Box 360, Willingdon, Alta., TOB 4R0; 403-367-2355
Produces cereal and oilseed crops on 1,400 acres.
Age 55. Farming 24 years.
He holds degrees in agricultural economics and in the winter months has worked with the Canadian International Development Agency in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Africa in areas of grain marketing and economic and aid development.
Monopoly: Strengthened Canadian Wheat Board will improve service to farmers and that price pooling is an area that should be maintained.
Payment options: There needs to be changes to the board that will provide new mechanisms that will improve cash flow for producers. He believes in single-desk selling, price pooling, government guaranteed initial payments and the prepayment of stored grain.
He does not endorse or wish to bring to the board of directors the agenda of any political party or farm organization but rather the messages given him by the producers in his region.
Business approach: His experience in other countries, as a farmer combined with his educational background and strong understanding of the western Canadian grain marketing system, provide him with the skills to be a director for the board.
District #6
WAYNE BACON
Box 667, Kinistino, Sask., S0J 1H0; 306-864-3278
Farms 2,300 acres with son. Owns 2,000 acres. Grows cereals and canola, and owns small commercial cow herd. Sometimes operates a feedlot.
Age 52. Farming fulltime since 1972. Grew up on the family farm.
Member of the local Saskatchewan Wheat Pool committee. Member of Saskatchewan Canola Growers Association. Former chair of the Kinsmen Telemiracle Foundation.
Received diploma in agriculture in 1967 for a two-year course at the University of Saskatchewan.
Monopoly: Supports the CWB export monopoly unless and until a viable system allowing farmers to market without the board without hurting farmers can be created. “I’m not off in left field, but until there’s a viable way to do it, we can’t lose the monopoly.”
Payment options: Believes farmers should have the option to cash-sell on delivery, and that the board should offer hedging contracts. “I think we have to have choices within the Canadian Wheat Board.”
Says initial prices should be much closer to final sales prices.
Car allocation: Suspicious of the idea of taking the board out of grain car allocation. The board may need to stay involved to make sure farmers are protected from railways and grain companies. Willing to consider the idea.
Openness: The wheat board needs to be more open in dealing with farmers. Some commercial deals will always be confidential, but operations of the board should be revealed to farmers. “There has to be fairness to all farmers and it has to be up front.”
Thinks the first board of directors should pressure the federal government to put up money for contingency fund, because farmers cannot afford more deductions from the price they receive for grain.
ALLAN M. BURECHAILO
Box 132, Domremy, Sask., S0K 1G0; 306-423-5444
Farms 960 acres. Grows cereals, pulses and oilseeds. Owns small Gelbvieh and commercial cow herd.
Age 50.
Grew up on family farm near Domremy.
Worked for the Royal Bank as an agricultural lender for 16 years, worked in business and for Saskatchewan Agriculture. Started farming fulltime when his father died.
Has a crop production certificate and crop management certificate from the University of Saskatchewan. Long-time member of Knights of Columbus and former provincial governor of Kinsmen of Saskatchewan.
Monopoly: Supports the single-desk status of the CWB.
Concerned about the growing power of multinational corporations over prairie agriculture.
Payment options: Willing to consider idea of allowing farmers to cash sell grain, but would only accept this option if it could be proved to help all farmers and not weaken the price pools most farmers rely on.
Car allocation: Thinks the grain transportation system works best when the wheat board is involved in grain car allocation. Farmers need to ensure they have some say in the transportation system.
Openness: Said the wheat board needs to be more open with farmers. “It doesn’t seem accountable. Answers always seem evaded.”
Wants the board to bring initial prices more in line with final sales prices because farmers need a better sense of what they’ll receive from their grain much earlier in the year so they can more accurately forecast their finances and make spending decisions.
CHAD DOERKSEN
Box 111, Dalmeny, Sask., 306-254-4316
Has “fair size” farm, but declined to give an exact size. Grows wheat, barley, canola and oats. Not a member of any farm organizations.
Age 24. Started farming fulltime with his father three years ago.
Member of the advisory council for the board of directors of Briercrest Bible College. Received a two-year Associate of Arts degree from Briercrest Bible College in 1995.
Takes a wait-and-see attitude on most issues that farm groups have raised about the wheat board. Wants to take a good look first, communicate with constituents if he is elected, then follow their wishes. “You can’t just go in and say boom boom boom. You need six, seven, eight months to see how the wheat board is operating.”
Openness: Thinks the CWB doesn’t show enough openess and must open up to farmers.
“How can an organization that’s supposed to work for the farmer not tell the farmer anything?”
The board needs to show a “servant” attitude when dealing with farmers.
Business approach: Said some may think he is very young to be seeking the post, but notes it is vital that the voice of beginning farmers like him is heard on the board of directors. “I want to bring a different look, a different view, to the board.”
GARRY MICHAEL DUBYK
Box 232, Hanley, Sask., S0G 2E0; 306-544-2400
Owns 800 acres, rents 3,000. Produces wheat, canola, barley, peas, lentils and hay, along with a 40 pair cow-calf herd.
Age 37, farming full-time since 1988.
Councillor for R.M. of Rosedale for past seven years. Not a member of any farm organization. Worked off farm in oilfields and construction before becoming full-time farmer.
Monopoly: Neither a strong supporter nor opponent of CWB. Some changes are needed for the board to survive. Will find out what farmers in his district want and act accordingly.
Payment options: Uncertain about value of the various pricing options that have been discussed, like cash buying.
Worries about the costs of administering such programs. If that’s what farmers want, it might be simpler just to have a dual market.
Car allocation: Wants the board to stay heavily involved in transportation, saying it is the only player that stands up for farmers’ interests against the railways and grain companies. “I think transportation is one of the major things the board does for farmers.”
Openness: While information about things like CWB salaries could be made public, information about specific sales and other commercial matters should remain confidential.
Not running with any particular policy agenda.
Will do what the majority of farmers in his district want.
Job of the directors will be to check on the accountability and credibility of the board. Directors shouldn’t get involved in day-to-operations or selling grain; rather, they should set policy guidelines and take information back and forth between farmers and the board.
BARRY F. L. FIRBY
Box 160, Kenaston, Sask., S0G 2N0; 306-252-2828
Produces canola, barley, wheat and specialty crops. Farms 4,000 acres in partnership with son and mother.
Age 51. Farming since 1967.
Not involved in any farm organizations. Attended Canadian International Grains Institute course in 1998. Founder (in 1984) and chair of Kenaston Super Draft Hockey Pool. Constituency assistant to Reform party MP Allan Kerpan 1993-96. Currently works for Reform party as regional organizer for Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
Monopoly: Wants to look at alternatives to CWB monopoly that might provide better returns for farmers. Says board should remain involved in exporting wheat and barley, says he is not a “blind proponent” of a dual market.
Payment options: Supports idea of “pricing flexibility” tools such as cash purchases by board, early pool closing, negotiable producer certificates and early individual cash payout from the pool account. Ideas need more study and input from local farmers.
Car allocation: Issue of board’s role in transportation system needs more study, especially in light of Willard Estey review. Wants more accountability in the transportation system including assigning responsibility for breakdowns.
Openness: Says farmers want the board to be more open and accountable. Wants directors to take lead in improving communications between board and farmers. Some information must remain confidential, but farmers have a right to know as much as possible.
Emphasizes he is not backed by any farm lobby group or organization and so if elected, will owe no favors. Goal is to reflect farmers’ views, try to develop consensus and work for changes that will boost returns.
Business approach: Background in business and political organizing provides skills in working with and listening to other people. “What I bring to the table is to be able to go in with an open-minded approach to identify the areas we could improve and try to bring a well-rounded solution.”
DMYTRO (DAN) KACHUR
Box 212, Lanigan, Sask., S0K 2M0; 306-365-4614.
Produces wheat, canola, flax and a number of specialty crops. Owns 1,100 acres, farms a total of 1,700 acres with son.
Age 67. Farming for 47 years.
Currently councillor for R.M. of Wolverine, member of district health board and Saskatchewan Wheat Pool committee member. Former member of hospital board, watershed board and director for National Farmers Union.
Not currently member of any farm group or political party.
Has taken some agriculture courses at University of Saskatchewan and often worked off-farm, usually in area of farm machinery.
Monopoly: Supports the CWB as single-desk selling agency, with price pooling and government price guarantees. Doesn’t want private grain companies competing with board. Supports a vote to have all major grains under the CWB.
Payment options: Doesn’t like idea of board making cash purchases of grain outside pool accounts, fearing it would undermine the board.
Price pooling must apply to everyone in order to work.
Car allocation: Wants the board to become more involved in co-ordinating transportation, including allocating rail cars to provide equity for farmers. “The wheat board is the only thing keeping the railroads in line. If they didn’t, who would?”
Openness: The board has to maintain some confidentiality for commercial and competitive reasons, although it could probably make more information available to farmers. “I think they could be a bit more open.”
Other comments: As a director he would push for a two-price wheat system, with a higher price for wheat or barley sold to domestic consumers, thus putting more money into all farmers’ pockets and easing pressures for a dual market.
Business approach: Would be open and seek input from farmers in all decisions.
“That’s what we’re there for, to be the medium between farmers and government and ensure farmers are heard.”
RUSSEL JOSEPH GRANT MARCOUX
505 Gabriel Road, Saskatoon, Sask. S7T 1A9; 306-373-6104.
Produces wheat, durum, barley, oats, canola, flax, peas and lentils. Farms 8,000 acres (Granmark Farms, Viscount, Sask.) in partnership with brothers.
Age 47. Farming 25 years.
Serves on the boards of St. Paul’s Hospital, Saskatoon, and Crime Stoppers, is chair of the Transportation Career Development Centre and member of federal government’s trade advisory group for transportation issues.
Former board member of Saskatchewan Transportation Company. Never been a member of any farm organization.
President and chief executive officer of the Yanke Group, a Saskatoon-based transportation business. Received Bachelor of Arts from University of Saskatchewan in 1973.
Monopoly: Believes the CWB has done a good job selling grain and representing farmers and should continue, but has no strong opinion on the single desk/dual market debate: “I’m prepared to listen to the different facts and evaluate it with an open mind.”
Payment options: Supports the concept of optional cash buying in principle, but the key issue will be how much the price is discounted to cover the additional risk factor. It’s a “progressive” idea, but if it’s not viable, farmers won’t use it.
Car allocation: The board should remain involved in transportation. It represents farmers’ interests in discussion with railways and grain companies. The “port buyer” idea should be decided by farmers.
Openness: Believes board has been too secretive and needs to do a better job of communicating information to producers and getting feedback from farmers into decision-making.
Wants the board to seek farmers’ views for fresh ideas on ways to improve cash flow, like more frequent pool payouts.
Business approach: As director, would bring wide experience from the worlds of business and organizations, and would adhere to the values of honesty, integrity, tenacity and responsibility.
IAN LORNE McCREARY
Box 69, Bladworth, Sask., S0G 0J0; 306-567-2099
Produces peas, lentils, canola, wheat, durum, barley, flax and forages and has a cow/calf operation. Farms about 1,100 acres.
Age 36. Full-time farmer since 1993.
Received Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in agricultural economics from University of Saskatchewan. Nominated for Governor-General’s medal for academic achievements.
Worked for the Canadian Wheat Board from 1986-1991 as senior policy analyst, trade policy analyst, price and foreign competition analyst and marketing manager for Europe. Left CWB to work in Africa, then worked with Canadian Foodgrains Bank analyzing and developing food aid programs.
Monopoly: Supports a strong CWB, will consider changes that are consistent with single-desk selling, price pooling and government guarantees: “It will cost producers money if we allow Canadian grain to compete with Canadian grain.”
Payment options: Opposes a daily cash price offer because it is inconsistent with price pooling and would make it difficult to attract deliveries to the pool account in certain market conditions. Early pool close-outs or allowing producers to opt out of the pool for a cash settlement need more study.
Car allocation: The board’s role in transportation is essential to good customer service and equitable access for producers:
“Moving the board to a port buyer would cost farmers a lot of money.”
Openness: Sensitive commercial information must be kept confidential. The director’s role is to provide farmers with as much information as possible and gain farmers’ trust. Farmers’ sense of ownership of the CWB has deteriorated and must be restored.
Says his understanding of farming, the international marketplace and strategic planning make him a good candidate.
MICH P. OZEROFF
Box 290, Langham, Sask., S0K 2L0; 306-283-4726.
Produces wheat, canola, flax, rye, oats and barley. Farms about 3,000 acres with his son.
Age 59. Farming for 40 years.
Director of Saskatchewan Wheat Pool for 10 years, pool delegate for 19 years. Chair of Saskatchewan Council on Community Development, which administers Canadian Adaptation and Rural Transition program. Served four years as councillor for R.M. of Corman Park, member of a number of co-ops and credit-unions, not a member of any farm organization.
Monopoly: Strong supporter of CWB as single-desk seller with price pooling and government guarantees. Wants producer vote to add other crops to CWB: “I’d be quite happy to sell all my grains through the CWB.”
Payment options: Leery about proposals for cash buying and opting out of pool accounts. For single-desk selling to work, everyone has to be in the pool. Board needs guaranteed supplies in order to forward sell and price. Anyone opting out must stay out for two or three years.
Car allocation: The board must remain involved in transportation planning and co-ordination, so it can make sales commitments and be assured the right grain will be delivered to port at the right time.
The Canadian Transportation Agency case showed the value of having the board work on farmers’ behalf in transportation.
Openness: Understands farmers’ frustrations on secrecy issue, but feels board has been as open as it can, especially about sales: “How many times have Cargill and others said what their sales are at?”
Feels board must grow and expand in order to survive, including marketing other commodities and studying joint marketing programs with U.S. farmers who support price pooling.
Business approach: His experience on the SWP board has shown him the importance of understanding policy and of being able to develop and work within a mission statement as decisions are made.
GREGORY WOLFF
Box 265,
