Canada’s reputation worth protecting – WP editorial

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: August 22, 2002

SUPPOSE you buy a tractor from a reputable machinery dealership. You

select the most powerful tractor with top-rated performance because

you have tough jobs for it in the field.

Once you get it home, you find the tractor does not meet expectations.

Under the hood you find a far inferior engine to the one you were

guaranteed.

When you protest to the dealership, the salesman shrugs: “You wanted a

tractor with an engine, you got a tractor with an engine.” He says the

Read Also

A wheat field is partially flooded.

Topsy-turvy precipitation this year challenges crop predictions

Rainfall can vary dramatically over a short distance. Precipitation maps can’t catch all the deviations, but they do provide a broad perspective.

inferior engine doesn’t make a difference to performance. The tractor

still runs, right?

Sounds like a ridiculous scenario, doesn’t it?

Yet this same irresponsible attitude is causing unlicensed wheat to

enter the grain system and jeopardize Canada’s reputation for seed

quality and performance.

Some farmers in east-central Saskatchewan have delivered unlicensed

American wheat varieties to elevators, claiming they were legal

varieties of top grade red spring wheat.

Maybe they didn’t know what they were selling or maybe they did it

intentionally to increase profits. Farmers frustrated by drought, low

prices and foreign subsidies may be attracted to unlicensed U.S.

varieties that return a 10 or 15 percent yield advantage over some

Canadian varieties.

Farmers who grow unlicensed varieties must tell grain companies what

they are selling at time of delivery. Then the grain can only be sold

as feed wheat.

But unlicensed varieties passed off as something else can have huge

financial implications for grain companies, harm the international

market reputation and ultimately affect other Canadian farmers.

Last spring, more than 5,000 tonnes of No. 1 Canadian western red

spring wheat were downgraded after 60 rail cars shipped out of Agricore

United’s elevator at Canora, Sask., were found to be heavily

contaminated with unlicensed wheat.

The cars, shipped to terminals at Thunder Bay and Montreal, contained

the U.S. hard red spring variety Oxen. The downgrade cost AU hundreds

of thousands of dollars.

In July this year, two truckloads of wheat delivered to the Pioneer

Grain Co. at Norquay, Sask. were contaminated with Oxen and 2375,

another unlicensed U.S. variety.

A cautious elevator manager binned the wheat separately, which limited

the extent of contamination, but there were still financial costs.

In July the Canadian Wheat Board and the Canadian Grain Commission held

a meeting in the east-central Sask. area to warn that unlicensed

varieties must be kept out of the grain export system. If the grain

reaches millers or bakers, the results could be disastrous, farmers

were told. Buyers would lose confidence in Canada’s quality control

system, and Canada would lose its competitive edge in foreign markets.

Consider the tractor example again. If you think you have the best

equipment for the job, you handle it in a certain way and expect

specific results.

Farmers must respect the integrity of Canada’s grain export system and

make every effort to meet the standards expected by their markets.

Whether they are selling to grain companies or to their next door

neighbours, farmers must be honest about what they’re selling.

Unlicensed varieties may have higher yields or appear to have other

benefits over licensed varieties, but farmers must accept

responsibility for what they grow.

There are reasons these varieties are unlicensed. Until they are

legally accepted, farmers should expect these crops will receive lower

grades and plan their crop choices and handling methods accordingly.

The CGC said grain sales mechanisms are slowly moving toward an

affidavit system. When that happens, growers will bear even more

responsibility for what they grow. There will be a higher level of

traceability and penalties will likely be imposed on those who break

the rules.

While the desire to maximize profit is understandable, it’s

short-sighted to seek those profits by deceiving buyers, accidentally

or intentionally.

If penalties or other measures must be introduced to identify and teach

the guilty farmers, so be it.

There is too much at stake to let unlicenced grain into the system.

Zero tolerance is a must.

explore

Stories from our other publications