Canada wins gold in CWB challenge – WP editorial

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 21, 2002

AT a time when people gripped in Olympic fever are obsessed with

winners and losers, Canada boasts an impressive win record: Canada 9,

United States 0.

The Canadian Wheat Board remains free of penalties after nine trade

challenges since 1990 by the U.S.

In the latest round, U.S. trade representative Robert Zoellick did not

impose tariffs, quotas or other restrictions against Canadian wheat

shipments to the U.S.

The International Trade Commission surveyed American wheat buyers and

Read Also

Wheat is being augered into the box of a grain truck.

Crop profitability looks grim in new outlook

With grain prices depressed, returns per acre are looking dismal on all the major crops with some significantly worse than others.

millers about CWB sales practices for the last five years. It also

surveyed foreign market wheat buyers about competition between Canada

and the U.S. and studied the trade effects of prices, exchange rates,

transportation, marketing practices and farm policy.

After 16 months of ITC investigations, Zoellick criticized the board

but said no actions will be taken because it would violate the U.S.

commitment to the World Trade Organization and the North American Free

Trade Agreement.

CWB officials say it’s proof the board is a fair trader and that the

Americans couldn’t find a strong case to support a tariff.

The ITC concluded that the price for top grade Canadian durum surpassed

that of top grade U.S. durum in 59 of the 60 months it studied.

American millers told the commission that the board was a fair and

honest trader that was dependable in supplying high quality durum.

But the U.S. government had to pacify states that are politically

strategic in upcoming congressional elections.

Wheat-growing states can now claim partial victory because Zoellick

talked tough about future actions that could include a WTO challenge,

the filing of countervailing and anti-dumping petitions and pursuit of

reforms to the wheat board in the next WTO trade round.

But in reality Zoellick has done nothing due to fears of retaliation.

As he told a U.S.Senate committee on finance in early February, the

U.S. plans this year to resolve trade disputes “in a way that best

serves America’s interests” but it must “avoid large trade retaliation

against U.S. exporters and the risks of spiraling conflict….”

The American government cares about farmers but it probably cares more

about big businesses.

The North Dakota Wheat Commission, which launched the latest petition

against the CWB, is disappointed that no tariffs were imposed but is

claiming victory because Zoellick opened the door to further trade

action.

But if there is a tenth challenge, and even if Canada successfully

defends its trade practices yet again, the ultimate losers on both

sides of the border are farmers. Time and money would be better spent

working together to raise grain prices for all farmers.

explore

Stories from our other publications