U.S. eager to ease beef row with Japan

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 9, 2006

DENVER, Colo. – A thorough investigation has been promised into how bone-in beef from the United States arrived in Japan, immediately halting trade between the two countries.

U.S. agriculture secretary Mike

Johanns has called this ban a temporary setback.

“The failure to meet the terms of the export verification program with Japan is unacceptable,” he told a general session at the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association convention in Denver on Feb. 3.

Japan agreed to take American beef after two years of negotiations and special concessions, only to see the deal collapse in less than two weeks after Japanese inspectors found three boxes of veal racks from a New York processor.

Read Also

 clubroot

Going beyond “Resistant” on crop seed labels

Variety resistance is getting more specific on crop disease pathogens, but that information must be conveyed in a way that actually helps producers make rotation decisions.

Johanns said it appears from paperwork that a Japanese importer had ordered that specific product.

About $14 million US worth of beef is now stranded at airports in Japan and the Japanese media is suggesting the U.S. should pay to remove it.

Johanns said no official request has come so no decision has been made on its removal.

About 2,000 tonnes of American beef are also heading to Japan by ship. The U.S. is looking for other buyers in the Asian rim but has been unable to find any.

Johanns has instructed his department to conduct an investigation and is enacting a 12-step plan to improve the American inspection system to avoid further violations.

Following the investigation, Johanns said, he will be willing to allow Japanese inspectors into American plants if that is what it takes to resume trade.

“That would be very unusual by international standards,” he said.

U.S. practices questioned

Meanwhile, members of the opposition in the Japanese Parliament criticized practices in U.S. plants after a recent inspection claimed specified risk materials were not correctly removed.

Johanns said there are no problems with SRM removal and the politicians’ observations may have been based on a misunderstanding.

In Japan the spinal cord is removed before the carcass is split, while in North America separate saws are used to split carcasses and then remove the cord.

Johanns rejected pressure to implement trade sanctions against Japan, saying it could spark a trade war.

“One promise I will always make to our trading partners, whether it is Kobe beef from Japan or Canadian beef, I will make decisions based on sound science and international standards, not on who called me,” he told reporters.

None of this would have happened if the world abided by one BSE standard, rather than special deals, said Gary Horlick, the NCBA’s trade

lawyer.

“If everyone adhered to the standard you wouldn’t have a screw up with a packing plant and a shipment of veal,” Horlick told the NCBA international markets committee.

About the author

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth has covered many livestock shows and conferences across the continent since 1988. Duckworth had graduated from Lethbridge College’s journalism program in 1974, later earning a degree in communications from the University of Calgary. Duckworth won many awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Association, American Agricultural Editors Association, the North American Agricultural Journalists and the International Agriculture Journalists Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications