Report card includes A’s and F’s

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 7, 2002

The federal auditor general’s report identified a number of strengths

and weaknesses at the grain marketing agency.

Strengths:

  • Marketing grain – The board has a solid reputation as a strong and

capable marketer, with good market intelligence, well-developed annual

sales strategies and plans, tough and competent negotiators and good

customer relations. Longer-term planning and documentation of the sales

process could be improved.

accounting and reporting systems in place, is properly reporting pool

account results and is managing financial risk appropriately. More

information should be published regarding the revenues and costs of

pool accounts, and the agency should consider sharing net interest

earnings equally across all pool accounts.

  • Transportation and country operations – The board has appropriate

systems and practices in place to manage the orderly delivery and

transportation of grain to optimize returns to farmers. It should

publicize targets and performance indicators.

  • Communications and corporate policy – Communication with farmers has

improved, as has the board’s ability to discuss its position on key

policy issues. Long-term plans and strategies and performance measures

are lacking.

  • Price pooling – The board is calculating total net pooled returns to

farmers in accordance with the CWB Act. More detailed information on

pool accounts could be provided to farmers.

Weaknesses:

  • Governance – The board of directors has been too involved in

day-to-day management issues at the expense of providing oversight and

strategic direction. The board and senior management must clarify their

respective roles and responsibilities.

  • Strategic planning – Corporate plans and budgets have been based on a

one-year time frame, although a five-year plan is now in the works,

identifying strategic direction and long-term goals and objectives.

Operating goals must be closely linked with the strategic plan.

  • Performance measurement and reporting – The board needs a

comprehensive and balanced set of performance measures, along with

improved reporting, in order to assess whether it is achieving desired

outcomes. The goal is to ensure the agency is more accountable to

farmers and stakeholders.

  • Information technology – There are many significant weaknesses in the

board’s IT systems and practices compared to organizations of a similar

size and complexity. The board has prepared a detailed action plan and

introduced a number of measures to improve the situation.

About the author

Adrian Ewins

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications