Price and timing

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: October 14, 2010

In a recent letter to the editor ( “Rhetorical mud”, Open Forum, Sept. 9), Stewart Wells, past president of the National Farmers Union and current CWB director candidate, criticizes the Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association for seeking the opportunity to price and deliver our grain at a time of our choosing, instead of supporting the CWB monopoly.

The wheat growers believe each individual farmer should be free to decide what is best for his or her farm, whether that means selling their grain on their own or in co-operation with others. In matters of commerce, we do not believe the wishes of one farmer, or even a majority of farmers, should be imposed on others. Each farmer should be free to make the business decisions that best suit his or her farm.

Read Also

A close-up of the hands of a farmer holding soybean seed in his cupped hands.

U.S. government investigates high input costs

The USDA and DOJ are investigating high input costs, but nothing is happening in Canada.

I note too that as an organic producer, Mr. Wells has the opportunity to buy back his wheat from the CWB for a few cents per bushel, whereas the buyback rates charged to conventional farmers are prohibitively expensive.

If elected, will Mr. Wells end this discrimination against conventional farmers and ensure all farmers have access to buybacks at the same rate, or will he continue to support preferential treatment for himself and other selected farmers?

The wheat growers favour a grain marketing system where all farmers are treated equally under the law, with the freedom to sell their grain to a buyer of their choice, rather than special privileges being granted to the favoured few.

Kevin Bender,

President,

Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association,

Red Deer, Alta.

About the author

Kevin Bender

University Of Minnesota Extension

explore

Stories from our other publications