Preconditioning can be hard on calves

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: April 11, 2002

EDMONTON – New research has found that calves that were weaned and

vaccinated at least two weeks before being transported long distances

had higher shrink and lower average daily gain than calves that had

never been handled.

Karen Schwarztkopf-Genswein, a beef animal welfare and behaviour

specialist at Alberta Agriculture’s research centre in Lethbridge,

Alta., said preconditioned animals that were hauled 15 hours in a truck

had 23 percent shrink compared to 7.7 percent shrink in

non-preconditioned calves hauled the same distance.

Read Also

Ripening heads of a barley crop bend over in a field with two round metal grain bins in the background on a sunny summer day with a few white clouds in the sky.

StatCan stands by its model-based crop forecast

Statistics Canada’s model-based production estimates are under scrutiny, but agency says it is confident in the results.

“We were very surprised in our findings,” she said.

Before the study, farmers and researchers believed preconditioned

animals would have less shrink and would recover their body condition

faster than animals that weren’t pre-conditioned.

“The combination of a two-week precondition and long haul turned out to

be not good for the animals,” she told the Alberta Farm Animal Care

annual meeting.

The study was partly funded by AFAC to see what effect preconditioning

had on calves when they were transported short and long distances, and

to find the best combination of preconditioning and transportation

scenarios to produce the least stress.

The study divided 174 calves into two groups. Half were preconditioned

and half were not. The preconditioned calves were vaccinated 30 days

before leaving the One-Four Ranch in southern Alberta and weaned 14

days before.

The other group was vaccinated when arriving at the research station

and weaned the day they were shipped.

Half of the calves from each group were taken on a three-hour truck

ride to simulate a short haul, while the other half went on a 15-hour

truck ride to simulate a long-haul trip.

The non-preconditioned calves were also left 24 hours in a feedlot pen

with only water after the trip to simulate an overnight stay in an

auction market sale. The next day they were taken on another three-hour

trip to simulate a short haul from the auction market.

Once at the Lethbridge research centre, the calves were weighed and

monitored for 30 days. In the first 24 hours, the preconditioned

long-haul calves drank 66 percent more water than the

non-preconditioned calves.

“It seems like preconditioning might not be the way to manage animals,”

Sch-warztkopf-Genswein said.

Researchers believe that double handling the animals before shipping

may create more stress for the calves than separating them from the

cows just before transport. An infrared thermography camera that takes

the surface temperature of the area around the eye found that the

preconditioned calves had a significantly higher temperature, which

researchers believe shows the calves were already stressed from the

weaning and vaccinating.

“Those calves suffered a double whammy close to each other,” she said.

During the 30 days that the animals were studied, the preconditioned

long-haul calves also had the lowest average daily gain. They gained

only one kilogram per day compared to 1.3 kg a day in the

non-preconditioned long-haul calves and preconditioned short haul

calves, and 1.4 kg a day for the non-preconditioned short-haul calves.

Schwartzkopf-Genswein will continue to study the possibility that

weaning two weeks before transport may be too short a time to get

preconditioning benefits. She will continue to juggle the way animals

are preconditioned and the length of time before they are transported

to come up with an ideal scenario that causes the least stress on

calves.

“We want to build best management strategies. What is the best time to

wean?”

explore

Stories from our other publications