OTTAWA (Reuters) — Canada’s official environmental watchdog has expressed concern that authorities were allowing the long-term use of pesticides linked to bee deaths despite not having enough information about the products.
The Pest Management Regulatory Agency, which is responsible for pesticide regulation, can grant a five-year provisional license to some products to give manufacturers time to provide more information.
Environment commissioner Julie Gelfand said nine products had remained conditionally registered for more than a decade, even though the agency had not gathered the data it required.
Read Also
Ag in Motion speaker highlights need for biosecurity on cattle operations
Ag in Motion highlights need for biosecurity on cattle farms. Government of Saskatchewan provides checklist on what you can do to make your cattle operation more biosecure.
Eight of the nine are neonico-tinoids, which many beekeepers blame for devastating their hives.
“These products continue to be used extensively in Canada despite widespread concern they may pose a threat to bees, other pollinators and broader ecosystems,” Gelfand said.
Pesticide use is a sensitive issue in Canada. Ontario became the first government in North America in July to curb use of seed treated with neonicotinoids, which are used to kill insects that harm crops.
Gelfand said the prolonged use of products with conditional registrations means “users may come to depend on a product that is ultimately shown to be unsafe.”
In some cases, firms had not provided the required data for neonicotinoid pesticides. Even so, the agency continued to allow the products to be conditionally registered.
In a written response, the PMRA said it would gather the information more quickly in the cases of products that had been granted conditional registrations.
The PMRA said it would stop issuing conditional registrations June 1.
It recently said that available science suggested multiple factors could be responsible for bee deaths, including loss of habitat and food sources, diseases, viruses and pests, and pesticide exposure.
It has also concluded that there was no risk to bees from the insecticide imidacloprid when it was used to coat seeds, although it did find that bees could be endangered when the pesticide was used to treat soil or applied to plants.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently said its own preliminary risk assessment of imidacloprid found that chemical residues of more than 25 parts per billion would likely harm bees and their hives and result in the bees producing less honey.
Gelfand also found that the PMRA had moved slowly to remove dangerous pesticides. It took the agency up to 11 years to remove some products deemed harmful.
