Mitigation effort weighed in crop insurance payout

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: August 15, 2002

Grasshoppers are chowing down on what little crop remains around Menno

Waldner’s Langham, Sask., farm.

He and his neighbor Richard Mierau have few options, other than early

cutting and baling for animals and hoping that something might be left

to combine.

Both expect yields will be a tenth of normal, maybe six to seven

bushels to the acre.

“I’ve never seen such a dilemma in my life,” said Waldner, who has been

farming for 35 years. He cited area fields where barley is half eaten

Read Also

A stock photo of some dark storm clouds with an obvious downpour happening over farm land in the middle of the image.

Extreme rain increases as planet warms

In this issue, we are going to wrap up our look at extreme rainfall by examining the different weather patterns that tend to be associated with these rainfall events.

by grasshoppers.

Waldner said most farmers are spraying their yard sites to keep them

out, but little can be done in the fields.

“We’re at a point where the crop is so poor, to spend money on it, it

doesn’t pay,” he said.

Waldner, who had sprayed for weeds on a summerfallow field adjacent to

Mierau’s oat crop, offered to spray when he saw the grasshoppers moving

over there.

It helped, but more arrive once the hoppers take flight, said Mierau.

Mierau, who insured his hay but not the oats, said grasshoppers are

eating kernels off the heads of plants.

“They are doing lots of damage and there are lots of them,” he said.

“It doesn’t matter what crop; they’re attacking them all.”

Ken Svenson of the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corp., said 16,374

pre-harvest claims were filed as of Aug. 6, up from 9,000 in 2001. The

northwest is hardest hit.

Svenson said farmers must file claims before putting the remaining crop

to alternate uses like grazing.

Grasshopper damage is an insurable loss but also a preventable one, he

said. Each claim must be considered on a field by field basis by the

insurance adjustor.

“There’s an expectation that producers take some mitigation efforts,”

he said. Otherwise they might have the cost of spraying deducted from

their payout.

That way, area farmers who choose not to spray do not receive the same

compensation as those who do.

“It’s to make sure the guy who doesn’t follow the recommended practices

is not advantaged financially,” said Svenson.

He said adjusters assessing claims will examine whether farmers had a

window of opportunity to spray for grasshoppers and whether it was

feasible to do so. They determine that by seeing what others have done

in the area.

“If everyone has the same problem, then we can assume the window of

opportunity was not there,” Svenson said.

About the author

Karen Morrison

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications