opinion
The simmering argument over Canadian Wheat Board powers involves much more than marketing tactics. Fundamentally, it is an argument over whether co-operative principles are still relevant.
Chief commissioner Lorne Hehn explained it well at a news conference last week, when he said the board has been based on a simple principle:
“If farmers band together to market their grain through a single agency which is back-stopped by the federal government, then everyone will be better off economically at the end of the year and at the end of a lifetime in farming.
Read Also
Increasing farmland prices blamed on investors
a major tax and financial services firm says investors are driving up the value of farmland, preventing young farmers from entering the business. Robert Andjelic said that is bullshit.
“There has always been something very rural and very Canadian about this simple but very profound concept – people working together and people sharing in the results.”
Although the board is not literally a co-operative, because federal sponsorship has been necessary to guarantee initial payments, it has effectively acted like a marketing co-operative and has traditionally found its strongest support from the co-operative movement.
An earlier generation of farmers knew the value of co-operation, and of having co-operatives work to promote co-operation.
Almost a half-century ago, as the world was emerging from the devastation of the Second World War, a president of Alberta Wheat Pool, Ben Plumer, declared: “It is the belief of co-operatives that the only path to prosperity and peace is the path of equality, of co-operation and of human brotherhood. More and more the public mind is coming to realize that co-operation must develop in place of competition in order to prevent conflict and bring about a fairer and more equitable distribution of wealth.”
Co-ops of that time (1946) fully realized the need to be profitable, cost-competitive, and successful in market share. Like their members, they had just endured the Depression and they had no money to spare on frills. But they believed that supporting co-operation in its various forms, including orderly marketing, was not a frill.
Obviously, times have changed, with one small example being last week’s comments from an Alberta Pool spokesperson:
“From a corporate perspective, it makes no difference to us whatsoever whether we have a Canadian Wheat Board or whether we have any other system of marketing. From a commercial perspective, we’re going to operate in whatever environment is there.”
As Plumer noted in 1946, it’s not guaranteed that all co-ops will be strong forces for social and economic justice. Unless its members have the co-operative spirit, he said, a co-op “resembles private business established and operated for profit alone.”
