Final grain marketing forum marked by poor attendance

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 1, 1996

WESTLOCK, Alta. – The Western Grain Marketing Panel’s series of meetings on marketing reforms ended with a whimper and a lack of consensus.

About 90 farmers gathered here Jan. 26, about 80 kilometres north of Edmonton, for the last of the panel’s 15 forums across the Prairies.

The low attendance puzzled panelist Owen McAuley, whose 5,000-acre mixed farm straddles the Saskatchewan-Manitoba border.

“Of all the meetings I’ve been to, this has been the most poorly attended,” said McAuley, who participated in all three Manitoba meetings and a forum in Saskatchewan.

Read Also

A hand uses a tool to scrape soil from a probe into two red, plastic coffee containers in a field.

Federal government supports soil health strategy

Sophie Beecher, director general at Agriculture Canada, said at a soil conference in Winnipeg that the feds support the idea of a national soil health strategy.

“I’m not sure why. This issue has been at the front burner here more than the other two provinces with the plebiscite (on dual marketing).”

While some organizers suggested frigid temperatures that hovered around -30 C might have contributed to a half-filled hall, one farmer suggested some grain producers might have viewed the meeting with cynicism.

“One guy said lot of people may have written this off as a Canadian Wheat Board meeting,” said Alex Allan, who farms 600 acres near Riviere Qui Barre, just north of Edmonton.

When the crowd broke into small working groups, the meeting highlighted the deep schism of opinion among farmers on the Canadian Wheat Board’s export grain marketing monopoly.

However, even staunch board defenders qualified their support. Many participants wanted the board to become more accountable to grain producers through reforms such as electing board commissioners.

The meeting’s debate surprised panelist Jack Gorr of Three Hills.

After hearing strong support for continuing the board’s monopoly at Kindersley and a powerful push for dual marketing at the Lethbridge and Drumheller hearings, the lack of unanimity in Westlock was refreshing for Gorr.

Allan wasn’t surprised to find Alberta producers differed from their Saskatchewan counterparts.

“I think people in Saskatchewan are comfortable with what happens, with the status quo. They are the main obstacle to changing the Crow Rate,” Allan said.

Change wanted

But the voices at the meeting echoed much of what McAuley heard at hearings in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. The common theme he said, is change.

While the Alberta plebiscite – where almost two-thirds of the province’s barley and wheat producers voted to end the Canadian Wheat Board monopoly – wasn’t mentioned during the formal part of the forum, it loomed over the meeting.

“Farmers in Alberta have already made their wishes known through the plebiscite,” said Stan Wiskel, who farms near Boyle. “They want more accountability, more say in the operations of the wheat board and to get the government out.”

With the town hall meetings concluded, the panel will prepare for public hearings in March. The panel has a June 30 deadline to get its report to Goodale.

About the author

Will Gibson

Freelance writer

explore

Stories from our other publications