Feds accused of attacking rural Canada

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 16, 2002

Opposition MPs set aside a full day of House of Commons time last week

to accuse the federal Liberals of intentionally isolating and punishing

rural Canadians in a bid to appease urban voters.

“We are a vast country and the vast majority of the people who live

beyond the glare of the big city are fed up,” said Saskatchewan

Canadian Alliance MP Garry Breitkreuz, who sponsored the debate.

He moved a motion condemning the government for “its sustained

Read Also

Open Farm Day

Agri-business and farms front and centre for Alberta’s Open Farm Days

Open Farm Days continues to enjoy success in its 14th year running, as Alberta farms and agri-businesses were showcased to increase awareness on how food gets to the dinner plate.

legislative and political attacks” on rural Canada.

The opposition list of federal crimes against rural Canada was long –

the end of the Crow rate, a lack of investment in rural roads, gun

registration, declining farm incomes and current attempts to pass

species-at-risk and animal cruelty legislation.

Often, the list of complaints turned into the opposition parties’

agendas.

The Alliance called for an end to the Canadian Wheat Board monopoly, an

end to the gun registration system, less government and more tax cuts.

Saskatchewan New Democrat Lorne Nystrom suggested the problem was too

much tax cutting and too little government.

“We need a strong federal government that will take on the Americans in

terms of their trade policy,” he said. “We need a strong national

government with a national farm support program to make sure that all

farmers get back their costs of production as a minimum, plus a decent

income on which to live. That is the kind of vision we need.”

For the Liberals, of course, opposition accusations of a plot against

rural Canadians were partisan rhetoric devoid of reality.

“There is no attack on the lives of rural Canadians and on the

communities of rural Canada,” said secretary of state for rural

development Andy Mitchell.

Instead, the federal government is investing in infrastructure, trying

to equip rural Canada with better telephone and internet service and

trying to help rural communities grow and attract competitive

businesses.

Mitchell said he wants to “build a rural Canada that embraces the

world, not a rural Canada that hides from it.”

In the background of the Commons debate was a recent Statistics Canada

report that confirmed the income disparity between urban and rural

Canada.

The federal agency said that on average in 1995, per capita rural

incomes on the Prairies were more than $3,000 less than comparable

urban incomes.

While the gap between rural and urban incomes shrank during the past 20

years, it was more because urban incomes fell than rural incomes

increased.

In fact, between 1990 and 1995, “rural income declined by 1.2 percent

at the Canada level with most of the provinces experiencing stagnant or

declining incomes.”

Among rural areas across Canada, “Saskatchewan experienced the weakest

rural income growth from 1980 to 1995,” said the study. Between 1980

and 1995, average per capita rural incomes in Saskatchewan rose only

$300 to $14,916.

explore

Stories from our other publications