FCC bill criticized

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: May 10, 2001

The government’s proposals to expand the powers of the Farm Credit Corp. have provoked a political debate about whether the crown corporation is straying too far from its original goal of supporting farmers.

Amendments to FCC legislation approved in principle last week by the House of Commons would expand the lending mandate of the Regina-based corporation, allowing it for the first time to lend to farm service companies even if farmers do not own them.

The Canadian Alliance caucus voted against the bill last week, in part because of what it sees as dilution of the FCC focus on farm financial needs.

Read Also

Kim Davis speaks into a microphone at a meeting of the Oldman Lease Holders Association in Vauxhall, Alberta.

Petition launched over grazing lease controversy

Battle continues between the need for generation of tax revenue from irrigation and the preservation of native grasslands in southern Alberta rural municipality.

“I do not believe it is valid to extend Farm Credit Corp.’s involvement beyond farming operations,” said CA agriculture critic Howard Hilstrom.

FCC president John Ryan told MPs on the agriculture committee the FCC board has set $20 million as the maximum possible loan and it is restricted to lending only to small and medium-sized businesses.

Other amendments expected to be approved by summer:

  • Changing the name from Farm Credit Corp. to Farm Credit Canada.
  • Allowing the FCC to offer business services such as succession planning or land management to farmers, alone or in partnership with other businesses.
  • Permitting

the FCC to offer

equity financing.

  • Clarifying the corporation’s ability to offer lease financing to clients.

About the author

Barry Wilson

Barry Wilson is a former Ottawa correspondent for The Western Producer.

explore

Stories from our other publications