Fast food leads animal welfare

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: July 18, 2002

EDMONTON – Large corporations rather than governments are setting the

standards for farm animal welfare, says a Canadian adviser to the

American fast food industry.

David Fraser, an animal welfare professor from the University of

British Columbia, told the Alberta Farm Animal Care association

conference that provincial and federal governments have backed away

from setting housing and care standards for farm animals, especially

animals that are housed in barns, such as chickens and hogs.

“The social policy of farm animal welfare has passed from the

Read Also

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe takes questions from reporters in Saskatoon International Airport.

Government, industry seek canola tariff resolution

Governments and industry continue to discuss how best to deal with Chinese tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, particularly canola.

government sphere to the corporate sphere. And the result is that

change can happen far more rapidly, but the down side is there is much

less transparency and accountability,” he said.

“If a few corporations insist on certain animal welfare standards, that

can have far more impact than an act passed by a state legislature or a

national law that will be indifferently enforced.”

In Europe, strong government involvement has created tough farm animal

legislation, but in North America fast food companies such as

McDonald’s and Burger King have driven the change.

“The corporate world has become far more centralized and accessible, so

much buying power is concentrated in a few corporations.”

Chet England, senior director of product safety and regulatory with

Burger King, said the corporation’s decisions could be far reaching,

considering it has 11,400 restaurants worldwide – 368 in Canada.

“The Burger King system is a very, very large one with a global reach

with global accountability,” said England.

Each year the company buys $500 million worth of beef, $300 million of

chicken, $78 million of pork, $93 million of cheese, $40 million of

other dairy products and $40 million of eggs.

“It’s a lot of money, a lot of commerce and in our mind a lot of

accountability.”

With pressure from animal rights groups, Burger King has set standards

that its suppliers must follow if they want to continue supplying meat

and eggs to the company.

In the United States, suppliers must follow guidelines laid out by the

American Meat Institute for pork, National Chicken Council for broiler

hens and the United Egg Producer group for laying hens. Guidelines for

pork and dairy are being developed. In Canada, suppliers must follow

the codes of practice for animal care and handling.

Burger King will also inspect all slaughter plants that supply meat to

its restaurants to ensure they meet humane standards. A Burger King

representative is to inspect IBP’s Lakeside plant in Brooks, Alta., on

July 23 to ensure it is complying with humane and safe animal practices.

England said while animal rights groups prompted the company to look at

where its meat came from, it quickly took over the assurance programs.

“We are not puppets whose strings are being pulled by the advocacy

groups. For rightly or wrongly, we are doing this because we think

it’s the right thing to do.”

explore

Stories from our other publications