Farm money unlikely in next budget

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: December 12, 2002

The federal Liberals are doing everything in their power to douse

farmer expectations that next February’s national budget will have

anything for them.

Agriculture minister Lyle Vanclief uses every opportunity to insist

that last summer’s $5.2 billion commitment over five years is all there

is in new federal financing.

And neither Liberals nor Canadian Alliance MPs on the House of Commons

finance committee bothered to ask for more farm support when it

published a pre-budget report with recommendations for finance minister

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

John Manley.

The majority report tabled in the Commons noted that several farm

groups had attended public hearings and “expressed concern about the

challenges currently faced by the agriculture and agri-food industry.”

And it noted high transportation costs are a problem for farmers on the

Prairies.

However, the committee recommendation says only “the federal government

ensure that adequate attention is paid to the needs of rural and remote

communities.”

In minority reports, New Democrat MPs said more federal help is needed

beyond what has been promised. “An immediate increase in federal

support to farmers through the NISA is urgently needed.”

The Progressive Conservative Party said existing safety nets fall

“significantly short of meeting the basic needs of Canada’s agriculture

industry.”

It urged Manley to find more money. “Additional support is required and

should be one of the top priorities for the federal government.”

Canadian Alliance finance critic Charlie Penson, a northern Alberta

grain farmer, said in an interview MPs did not make strong farm support

recommendations because they did not receive strong pressure from

farmers.

“There wasn’t a whole lot of farmer input,” said Penson. “Perhaps they

are waiting to see how the current federal promises play out. I also

think there is a fatigue factor. Farmers know that governments know the

problem. What more can they do?”

The major farm presentation to the finance committee came in Saskatoon

where Canadian Federation of Agriculture vice-president Marvin Shauf

said producers want programs that are better than they have now, are

competitive with programs available to foreign competitors and include

guaranteed disaster relief.

“Farm income programs should be adequately funded and strategic,” he

said without adding a dollar figure.

“Safety net funding levels must be set to create a level playing field

with our competitors.”

explore

Stories from our other publications