EU’s trade future hinges on genome editing approval

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: June 30, 2016

KINGSTON, Ont. — The crop biotech industry will soon learn if Europe is headed into a regulatory abyss.

European politicians remain hostile to genetically modified crops, and over the last few months they have considered banning glyphosate, the most popular herbicide in the world.

It appears the European Union is becoming more opposed to any form of agricultural technology, says Maurice Moloney of the Global Institute for Food Security in Saskatoon, but if it creates strict regulations for genome editing, a technique promoted as the future of crop trait development, the continent is truly entering a dark age for biotech.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

“(Things) can potentially get better or potentially get worse (in Europe),” Moloney said at the Plant Biotech 2016 conference in Kingston, Ont., in June.

“Probably, the test case is going to be genome editing.”

The EU has to make a decision on CRISPR/Cas9, a technique used in genome editing to modify plant genes. Plant scientists say CRISPR is comparable to mutagenesis, in which a plant’s DNA is randomly altered with chemicals.

“Genome editing, by it’s very nature, is a technique (that is) very elegant mutagenesis,” Moloney said. “Mutagenesis is not regulated in the European Union.”

So far, regulators in the United States are accepting the argument that genome editing is like mutagenesis, said Jeff Habben, a senior research manager for trait discovery with DuPont Pioneer.

DuPont scientists recently used genome editing to develop a cultivar of waxy corn, a type of corn used to make glue and food thickeners.

“We submitted it to the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) … and they ruled, just last month, that they don’t consider this a regulated trait,” Habben said.

“So that’s a good sign.”

Moloney said European opposition to crop biotech is problematic for Canadian farmers and may compromise the Canada-EU trade deal.

“It is very worrying that (our politicians), both the U.S. and Canada, they haven’t specified this issue.”

Moloney said Canada has the best system in the world for regulating crop traits because Health Canada regulates the end product rather than the process.

“There’s one way through all of this and that’s to copy what Canada does,” he said. “That would be the way forward in a trade agreement.”

About the author

Robert Arnason

Robert Arnason

Reporter

Robert Arnason is a reporter with The Western Producer and Glacier Farm Media. Since 2008, he has authored nearly 5,000 articles on anything and everything related to Canadian agriculture. He didn’t grow up on a farm, but Robert spent hundreds of days on his uncle’s cattle and grain farm in Manitoba. Robert started his journalism career in Winnipeg as a freelancer, then worked as a reporter and editor at newspapers in Nipawin, Saskatchewan and Fernie, BC. Robert has a degree in civil engineering from the University of Manitoba and a diploma in LSJF – Long Suffering Jets’ Fan.

explore

Stories from our other publications