Easter suggests CWB vote wording

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: December 7, 2006

When agriculture minister Chuck Strahl announced an early 2007 plebiscite on whether to end the Canadian Wheat Board marketing monopoly, he invited the House of Commons agriculture committee and others to recommend an appropriate question.

He recently got his wish.

On a motion from Liberal agriculture critic Wayne Easter, the opposition majority on the committee recommended option questions on both wheat and barley.

The non-binding motion to be tabled in the Commons says farmers should be asked to choose between two questions on wheat and barley:

Read Also

An aerial image of the DP World canola oil transloading facility taken at night, with three large storage tanks all lit up in the foreground.

Canola oil transloading facility opens

DP World just opened its new canola oil transload facility at the Port of Vancouver. It can ship one million tonnes of the commodity per year.

“a) I wish to maintain the ability to market all wheat (barley), with the continuing exception of feed wheat (barley) sold domestically, through the CWB single desk system;” or

b) I wish to remove the single desk marketing system from the CWB and sell all wheat (barley) through an open market system.”

The motion also says the voters list should be the one laid out in the

Canadian Wheat Board Act, which includes all 2005-06 CWB permit book holders.

Conservative MPs on the committee argued that Easter’s motion was out of order. Chair Gerry Ritz agreed and ruled it could not be tabled but the opposition majority voted to overrule the chair.

Easter said later the Conservative resistance could signal a strategy.

“It could be the minister is planning a manipulative question to deceive farmers of the government’s true intentions on the future of the board.”

About the author

Barry Wilson

Barry Wilson is a former Ottawa correspondent for The Western Producer.

explore

Stories from our other publications