Debate touches on GM labelling and research

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: June 6, 2002

STONY PLAIN, Alta. – One of the oldest women’s organizations in Canada

waded into the debate on genetically modified organisms during its

annual general meeting.

The Alberta Women’s Institutes passed a motion requesting mandatory

labelling on all food that has been genetically modified, but defeated

a motion that research work be stopped on GM crops until scientists can

prove no danger exists from the research.

“If someone is trying to eat healthy and stays off that type of thing

Read Also

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe takes questions from reporters in Saskatoon International Airport.

Government, industry seek canola tariff resolution

Governments and industry continue to discuss how best to deal with Chinese tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, particularly canola.

they should have an alternative,” said Phyllis Kosik of Alberta Beach,

regarding her motion to have mandatory labelling of food products.

“A label may not be big enough for some things.”

But her motion to stop research until genetic modification can be

proved safe met with resistance. Kosik said she wanted more regulations

to prevent scientists from doing research on GM crops and organic crops

in the same research station.

“They’re spraying those crops and they’re growing organic next door.”

But the resolution soon turned into a general debate on GM crops and

research.

“In this day and age, scientists are trying to improve the quality of

food. There is no way I can support banning scientists from doing

research that needs to be done,” said Jeannette Coutts of Vermilion.

“Who is going to do the banning? That’s pie in the sky,” said Aileen

Kritzinger of Stony Plain.

Helen Standing of Hanna said she wanted some brakes put on research.

“Now they’re crossing vegetables with animals and I’d be opposed to

that,” said Standing.

Another member said scientists couldn’t run rampant just because it’s a

modern world.

In the end, the motion to ban research was defeated.

explore

Stories from our other publications