CHICAGO, Ill. (Reuters) — A federal appeals court has opened the door for Syngenta Seeds to revive a lawsuit it brought against Bunge North America in 2011.
The lawsuit is over the agribusiness company’s refusal to accept a variety of genetically modified corn.
An opinion in the case came Oct. 19 as Syngenta Seeds and its parent company, Syngenta AG, have become the target of lawsuits over the same variety of corn, Agrisure Viptera.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a district court to review whether Syngenta had standing to bring a claim of false advertising against Bunge in 2011 after Bunge began refusing to accept Viptera corn because it was not approved for export to China.
Read Also
Supreme Court gives thumbs-up emoji case the thumbs down
Saskatchewan farmer wanted to appeal the court decision that a thumbs-up emoji served as a signature to a grain delivery contract.
Syngenta sued Bunge over the decision, and a district court in 2012 ruled in Bunge’s favour.
The appeals court sent Syngenta’s false advertising claim back to the lower court for review, while affirming the lower court’s rulings in favour of Bunge on two other claims.
Viptera corn has become controversial because China last year began rejecting boatloads of U.S. corn containing the trait, known as MIR 162. Cargill and farmers have separately sued Syngenta, claiming they lost money from the trade disruptions.
Bunge expects to prevail on the false advertising claim in district court, spokesperson Deb Seidel said, adding the opinion was a clarification of a ruling the appeals court made in August.
