Containers vs. bulk: weighing the pros and cons

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 14, 2002

WINNIPEG – Shipping grain in bulk or in containers each has advantages

and disadvantages.

Here are some of the pros and cons, as described during last week’s

grain industry conference on containerized shipping.

BULK SHIPMENTS

Pros

  • Labour costs are lower because the grain is handled less, using

generally lower technology.

  • Ships and rail cars act as the “packaging,” while containers often

can produce plastic, wood and steel waste. This makes bulk shipping

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

more environmentally friendly.

  • Bulk shipping reduces problems associated with regional variations in

production. Grain from widely dispersed areas can be blended to produce

uniform, consistent grades.

Cons

  • Bulk shipments put large inventories into the supply pipeline, which

can slow down the ability to respond to market demand.

  • Because the bulk system is designed to handle maximum volumes and

minimum grade separations, it doesn’t do a good job dealing with small

volumes and a high number of segregations.

  • Bulk shipments require a massive and expensive infrastructure of

primary elevators and export terminals, which carry costs even when no

product is moved.

  • The large volumes shipped in bulk can cause cash flow problems for

niche customers who might want to buy smaller lots.

CONTAINERS

Pros

  • Because it’s a relatively new industry, especially in grain, costs

are declining and there are opportunities to develop more efficient

ways of doing business.

  • Can quickly move small quantities of specific products from farm to

customer, with good quality control.

  • A variety of products can be moved to different customers on the same

boat.

  • Have good backhaul potential without the danger of contamination

that’s present with grain hopper cars.

  • Smaller volumes mean better cash flow for customers.

Cons

  • Less efficient for the railways because shipping grain in smaller

containers reduces the revenue-bearing cargo weight of a train.

  • As a rule, container supply builds up in areas of high demand and

large populations, while they’re often hard to find in areas of low

demand, such as the Prairies.

  • Shipping bulk grain in containers, as opposed to shipping bagged

grain, can require retrofitting the container.

  • Some import facilities can’t handle containers or face additional

costs in doing so.

  • There is often a lack of consistent quality between containers

because they are loaded from small geographical areas.

About the author

Adrian Ewins

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications