CN takes Alta. to task over running rights

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: September 12, 2002

The Alberta government is off track in its support of joint running

rights, says the president of Canadian National Railway.

In a hard-hitting speech to the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, Paul

Tellier took the provincial government to task for supporting the

implementation of running rights in its submission to a federal

government panel reviewing the Canada Transportation Act.

He said that’s not the position he would expect Alberta’s free

enterprise government to take.

“Alberta’s political leaders are champions of free enterprise and

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

market forces,” he said Sept. 5. “And yet at the same time Alberta’s

department of transportation recommends re-regulation and market

intervention.”

He described running rights as the first step toward open access, under

which rail operators can apply for permission to run on someone else’s

track and “cherry pick” their traffic at regulated rates.

“Why should other railways be given the right to use our track?”

Tellier said. “They did not build it. They do not maintain it. They are

not responsible for the service it provides.”

He said CN is not opposed to sharing its line with other railways, and

in fact, routinely negotiates such arrangements with other shippers.

The big difference is those arrangements are the result of commercial

negotiations, with rates that reflect fixed and variable costs and the

impact of lost traffic.

“Rates must be negotiated, not imposed by bureaucrats in Ottawa,” he

said.

He described running rights as “regulated poaching” that wouldn’t be

tolerated in other industries such as oil.

But it’s a different matter in the agriculture industry, he said, where

there is a long tradition of “railway bashing” among western farmers.

“I know that CN and CP are never going to win popularity contests on

the Prairies, Hay West notwithstanding,” he said. “But the legacy of

past conflicts must not blind us to 21st century realities.”

Tellier said Canada’s rail regulatory system already has plenty of

safeguards.

For example, under competitive line rates, shippers served by only one

railway can ask a regulator to fix a rate to the nearest interchange

with another railway.

There is also final offer arbitration, whereby shippers can ask the

regulator to choose between the rate proposed by the shipper and the

rate offered by the railway.

About the author

Adrian Ewins

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications