Cash advances may be available for late crops

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: October 31, 2002

Farmers who don’t get their crops off this fall could still be eligible

for cash advances.

Edward Thomas, the Canadian Wheat Board’s manager of farm accounts,

said it’s up to organizations that administer cash advances to ask the

federal government to authorize payments under the emergency payment

provisions of the Advance Payments Program Act.

Based on experience, he said, the government will say yes.

“If there is a significant problem out there, I don’t see a problem in

Read Also

Kim Davis speaks into a microphone at a meeting of the Oldman Lease Holders Association in Vauxhall, Alberta.

Petition launched over grazing lease controversy

Battle continues between the need for generation of tax revenue from irrigation and the preservation of native grasslands in southern Alberta rural municipality.

getting the program authorized.”

He said the board will formally decide at the beginning of November

whether to ask the government to authorize emergency advances.

“It certainly looks like there will be a problem at this time, but a

lot will depend on the weather over the next couple of weeks.”

Ernie Doerksen of the Canadian Canola Growers Association, which

administers the advance payments program for non-board crops, said he

has already talked to federal officials about the issue.

Normally, farmers must have crop in the bin to qualify for a cash

advance, which is doled out based on the volume of grain harvested.

With much of the prairie crop still unharvested, some producer groups

have raised concerns about how that might affect advance payments for

board and non-board crops.

They’ve also expressed concern about how unharvested grain might affect

farmers who took out spring advances. They must be repaid by Dec. 31 or

rolled over into the 2002-03 fall cash advance program.

“This is just one example of the type of cash flow problems producers

are facing,” said Terry Hildebrandt, president of Agricultural Producer

of Saskatchewan, which had urged the federal government to implement

the emergency advance provision.

While there is a precedent for emergency fall advances for unharvested

grain, the question of how that will affect the relatively new spring

advances hasn’t been dealt with before.

“We have identified to the government already that there will be an

issue there for some farmers,” Thomas said. “Normally most farmers can

repay it by Dec. 31, but this year it is a potential issue.”

Under the emergency advance provision, farmers with unharvested crop

are eligible for an advance that is capped at either $25,000 or half of

the amount the farmer could have expected to receive if the grain was

harvested, whichever is less.

The latter is calculated by multiplying the number of unharvested acres

times the estimated yield times the per tonne advance rate.

For a regular advance, a farmer can receive up to $50,000

interest-free. The lower maximum for unharvested grain reflects the

expectation of lower-quality grain left out over the winter.

Doerksen said his biggest concern is estimating what’s in the field.

“How do you figure out how much grain there is to be harvested and that

it can be harvested in the spring and that it will be marketable?” he

said. “With yields and quality so variable, how do we determine what

it’s going to look like in the spring?”

The emergency advance provision was last used in 1996.

About the author

Adrian Ewins

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications