Canola growers’ election list challenged

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: October 17, 2002

Eduard Hiebert is accusing the Manitoba Canola Growers Association of

using a flawed membership list to decide who can vote during the

upcoming election of directors.

Hiebert, a canola grower and a director for the MCGA, insists the

membership list is inflated and includes the names of people who have

left farming or are dead.

While a provincial court ruling earlier this year helped remedy the

problem, he said the association remains a long way from having a list

Read Also

An aerial view of the

Increasing farmland prices blamed on investors

a major tax and financial services firm says investors are driving up the value of farmland, preventing young farmers from entering the business. Robert Andjelic said that is bullshit.

that accurately reflects its membership. He believes the result will be

skewed election results.

“I’m embarrassed that an organization could be so undemocratic,” said

Hiebert, who farms near St. Francois Xavier, Man.

But the association’s executive manager said the membership list is the

best that can be provided at this time. Bill Ross hopes new bylaws will

be passed in January that will make it possible to have a more current

list.

If passed, the bylaws will remove people’s names from the membership

list if they have not paid a checkoff on their canola sales within the

preceding two years. Those who paid a checkoff but received a refund

would also be removed from the list, Ross said.

“Our new set of bylaws will cover all of this. There won’t be a

problem.”

Hiebert said association members concerned about the irregularities and

the failure of the board of directors to correct the problem are

petitioning for an emergency meeting of members in November.

Under the constitution, the association president must call such a

meeting when at least 100 members request it in writing, Hiebert said.

He wants assurances that this fall’s election of directors will be fair

and democratic.

“I don’t think it’s good for our organization to have this kind of

airing. On the other hand, it’s much worse to not deal with it.”

Ross agreed the current membership list is inflated, but he said a

court ruling this summer tied their hands until the new bylaws get

passed. The judge ruled that the membership list that extended back to

1996 was the valid one. That list includes the names of anyone who paid

a checkoff on canola from that year onward.

Ross questioned the push for an emergency meeting.

“In my mind, we don’t need a special meeting to deal with this because

it will be dealt with in January.”

According to Hiebert, last fall’s election was conducted with a list of

about 10,000 members.

However, following that election, the membership gradually swelled to

more than 40,000 entries.

Hiebert requested a copy of the membership list but was told by the

MCGA that it was a confidential document that could not be released.

Determined to get the list, he took the matter to court and in a ruling

this summer, a provincial court judge ordered the MCGA to release the

membership list to Hiebert and to also send him a revised list that was

to be completed by Sept. 20.

Under the revised list, the membership was reduced to just under 20,000

names, Hiebert said. But he views the revised list as also being “very

substandard,” and he’s convinced that the true membership is somewhere

around 10,000.

Nominations for this year’s election of directors will close Oct. 30.

Ballots must be sent to eligible members by Nov. 15.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications