Alberta weighs risks, ponders prevention – Special Report

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: April 11, 2002

It would be easy for Alberta to become complacent about fusarium head

blight.

The disease exists only in low levels in the province.

Tests of grain entering Alberta during the past nine months found only

seven samples with Fusarium graminearum and the levels of

infection were extremely low.

But Curtis Weeks suggests it would be folly to think Fusarium

graminearum, the strain that has been so devastating for Manitoba, will

not become a menace in Alberta.

Read Also

A soybean field where researchers are trialing different bio-stimulants at the Manitoba Crop Diversification Centre near Carberry on Aug. 6, 2025.

Carberry field day looks for agriculture solutions

Manitoba farmers explored research solutions for resilient crops, perpetual agronomic issues and new kinds of agricultural products at a field day at the Manitoba Crop Diversification Centre in Carberry on Aug. 6.

“There is certainly risk there,” said Weeks, a cereal and oilseed

specialist with Alberta Agriculture.

“We’re trying to educate farmers about that risk and let them evaluate

it for themselves.”

Contrary to what people may think, Alberta’s soil and moisture

conditions are not much different from those in areas of Saskatchewan

and Manitoba where fusarium has become a problem, Weeks said.

One of the exceptions would be Manitoba’s Red River Valley.

Alberta has already listed

F. graminearum as a pest, and it supports the voluntary testing of

grain produced in the province for feed or seed.

This winter, meetings were held across Alberta to inform producers

about the risk.

The province now is considering other measures that might be needed to

keep the disease at bay.

There is some discussion about whether testing grain imports to Alberta

– both feed and seed – should be mandatory. Weeks said no decisions

have been made yet.

The Alberta branch of the Canadian Seed Growers Association supports

mandatory testing.

Branch president Mark Kaun said one of his concerns is the impact

fusarium could have on the malting and seed industries

in Alberta.

He also cautioned that cattle feeders in Alberta must take the fusarium

threat seriously.

“I hope they look at both sides of the picture so they’re not shooting

themselves in the foot.

“If we take barley out of the Alberta picture we’re in trouble.”

Weeks said part of the hope in Alberta is to keep fusarium head blight

at low levels until better ways to manage the disease are found,

including the development of more resistant cereal crop

varieties.

That was the strategy the province adopted with virulent blackleg in

canola and the strategy worked.

“We were spared the losses that other provinces had until better

varieties were out,” said Weeks.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications