Your reading list

‘Tough decisions’ in ag budget coming

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: January 24, 2002

RED DEER – Alberta’s Liberal leader and agriculture critic is warning

farmers that the province’s agricultural budget is likely to shrink as

government revenues decline.

“This is the first time in seven years the government has really had to

make choices when the revenues are expected to be less than they were

the year before,” Ken Nicol told the Wild Rose Agricultural Producers

Association’s annual meeting.

“There are going to have to be some really tough decisions made about

Read Also

Two horses, a bay and a gray, graze in front of a page wire fence in a scenic pen with pine trees in the background.

Why selenium is still an important factor in horse health

Selenium is an essential equine trace mineral that supports antioxidant defense, muscle integrity, immune function, metabolism and thyroid activity.

… how they are going to respond if we have another dry year like

we’ve had for the last two years.

“We’re starting to deal with issues about what is the responsibility of

the government.”

He said the government must decide how much responsibility it has for

rural communities, where agriculture is an important factor. It also

needs to analyze current programs.

Little money may be left over for agriculture because the province has

already made major commitments to health care, education and children’s

services, he said.

Somehow, the government must create farm income programs that meet cash

flow needs when the money is needed. Nicol said the Farm Income

Disaster Program introduced in 1995 works when farmers are confronted

with one bad year, but it cannot handle long-term crop failures and low

prices. Farmers need an insured level of revenue similar to what the

Gross Revenue Insurance Program intended to offer.

“FIDP needs to be modified to reflect the costs you have as farmers on

a sustainable agriculture production unit, not on the basis of what is

the revenue structure for the last three years.”

He said it needs to be part of a package of farm support programs.

Last year’s acreage payments created inequities among producers and

were immediately followed by higher input costs.

Wild Rose delegates resolved to ask for more, but president Neil

Wagstaff was cautious. As a member of the national safety nets

committee, he realizes government money is limited.

“It is difficult to make improvements because the funding simply isn’t

adequate,” Wagstaff said.

The group passed a resolution asking the federal government to increase

Net Income Stabilization Accounts contributions to six percent from

three percent.

Again, Wagstaff was cautious.

“We have to understand pursuing this type of support for NISA has

implications for other primary support programs.”

Other delegates said the government must strengthen programs for young

farmers.

“It has been demonstrated throughout the program that NISA was good if

you could afford it,” said John Ross.

“It’s not very good for the young farmer because he wasn’t farming when

you could save a buck once in a while.”

A second resolution dealing with farm support asked the province to

investigate and implement a trade-safe program that covers the cost of

production.

About the author

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth has covered many livestock shows and conferences across the continent since 1988. Duckworth had graduated from Lethbridge College’s journalism program in 1974, later earning a degree in communications from the University of Calgary. Duckworth won many awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Association, American Agricultural Editors Association, the North American Agricultural Journalists and the International Agriculture Journalists Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications