Your reading list

Corn found to meet feedlots’ nutritional needs

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: December 19, 2002

TABER, Alta. – Cattle feeders’ loyalty to Canadian barley loses some of

its lustre when costs rise and supply shrinks.

Many cattle feeders in Alberta have switched to cheaper American corn

for the last two seasons when locally grown barley supplies were tight

due to poor growing conditions.

Animal nutritionist Dwight Karren works with feedlots on nutrition

packages and has found corn and other alternative feeds work well.

“You can go back to barley but if you can’t get barley every day, what

Read Also

A group of pigs in an indoor pen standing on an orange plastic floor.

The Western Producer Livestock Report – August 28, 2025

Western Producer Livestock Report for August 28, 2025. See U.S. & Canadian hog prices, Canadian bison & lamb market data and sales insights.

are you going to do? Most feedlots have less than a week’s storage for

grain,” he said.

Concern raised about meat quality of corn-fed versus barley-fed steers

is moot. Canadians prefer the hard, white fat derived from barley fed

beef but American consumers prefer a softer, light amber coloured fat

produced by corn, said Karren.

Exporters found the product has been better received in the U.S.

” We thought we were sending them something they would like better than

their own product,” said Karren.

“The packers said ‘great.’ Now we don’t have to explain to our

customers why the fat isn’t yellow.”

His greatest challenge as a nutritionist is to calculate proper

supplements because feedlots change feeds depending on weekly supply

and price.

In normal years, most feeders are not interested in alternative feeds

but they have been forced to learn how corn might fit. They have

learned it can be processed as easily as barley and nutritionally, corn

works well enough, Karren said.

“There is certainly a lot more interest in investigating and looking at

alternatives because of the large losses that occurred in the feedlot

industry in the last few years.”

Nutritionists measure levels of crude protein, rumen digestible protein

and fibre of the grains. Corn is higher in energy but may have

inadequate protein. Evaluations are needed so cattle gain enough weight.

There are many sources of protein supplements for corn rations but cost

is often the greatest determinant. Urea or canola meal is high in

protein but can be expensive.

Corn-fed cattle need added protein until they reach at least 1,000

pounds.

Starch in corn is found in the protein matrix and many feedlots noticed

pasty manure, which indicates corn starch passed through the digestive

system.

Cattle tend to digest barley faster than corn and that can lead to some

liver problems.

Corn contains lower levels of minerals like calcium and phosphorous.

Some calcium supplements may be needed but Karren said he does not add

phosphorous to rations because of environmental concerns.

Trace minerals like copper, manganese and zinc are about 50 percent

lower in corn than barley. Feed tests should indicate the level of

supplements required.

In addition, more silage is included in Canadian feedlot diets.

Americans appear to be moving away from silage because it is bulky and

harder to deliver to the animals.

Cattle tend to be more productive with additional forage in their

diets.

“The cattle will appreciate it if we can do it,” Karren said.

About the author

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth has covered many livestock shows and conferences across the continent since 1988. Duckworth had graduated from Lethbridge College’s journalism program in 1974, later earning a degree in communications from the University of Calgary. Duckworth won many awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Association, American Agricultural Editors Association, the North American Agricultural Journalists and the International Agriculture Journalists Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications