Your reading list

Alberta defends NISA withdrawal

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: December 5, 1996

CALGARY – Alberta is defending its decision to end its participation in the Net Income Stabilization Account next year.

However, some delegates at the annual Alberta Wheat Pool meeting in Calgary told Walter Paszkowski, the province’s agriculture minister, they are not pleased with the decision.

Rene Blanchette of Girouxville said the program had merits.

“We finally put together an insurance program for the farmer that is bulletproof and now we’re proposing to drop it,” said Blanchette.

Paszkowski told delegates the program has some major flaws.

Read Also

A group of pigs in an indoor pen standing on an orange plastic floor.

The Western Producer Livestock Report – August 28, 2025

Western Producer Livestock Report for August 28, 2025. See U.S. & Canadian hog prices, Canadian bison & lamb market data and sales insights.

British Columbia announced last week that it will move away from NISA as well because of concerns with the program, said Paszkowski.

“The issue with NISA is that it is commodity specific and world trade doesn’t allow for commodity-specific programs,” he said.

Paszkowski wants the plan presented to the world trade organization for a ruling to ensure it is acceptable. He said Alberta’s Farm Income Disaster Program went to the organization for a decision and no concerns were raised, he said.

FIDP is designed to provide aid when a major disaster strikes farmers. He referred to the northeastern region of the province which sustained a decade-long drought until this fall. Paszkowski said farmers had drained their NISA accounts and had no cash left.

He is also concerned about beginning farmers hit with a major crop disaster before they had time to build NISA bankrolls.

“We have to find some process that’s going to allow the energy of the industry to carry on to our youth and our beginning farmers. We have to find a way so they’re not subject to the wrecks that are out there…. If we leave them out there on their own we’re going to lose this industry,” said Paszkowski.

Another fault with NISA is that the money ultimately leaves agriculture when a farmer retires. He can withdraw the account and move on.

“There are many components of the industry that are uncomfortable with NISA,” he said.

If NISA is reassessed and developed into a whole-farm program rather than a single-crop plan the province would reconsider its plan to withdraw, he said.

About the author

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth has covered many livestock shows and conferences across the continent since 1988. Duckworth had graduated from Lethbridge College’s journalism program in 1974, later earning a degree in communications from the University of Calgary. Duckworth won many awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Association, American Agricultural Editors Association, the North American Agricultural Journalists and the International Agriculture Journalists Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications