Procedure must be followed before road closure – The Law

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: June 13, 2002

Q: A road in our neighbourhood has recently been closed. This road has

provided access to a parcel of land for more than 50 years. What powers

do municipalities have to close roads? What if the road is over private

land?

A: The powers of municipalities are set out in the respective

provincial municipal legislation. In Alberta, a rural municipality must

take several steps before it can close a road. First, the intention to

close a road must be advertised, and people who might be affected must

Read Also

Several strokes of lightning arc downward from an angry dark cloud in the distance near dusk.

Ask tough questions to determine if business still works

Across the country, a hard conversation is unfolding. Many producers are starting to ask a tougher question: can we keep doing this the way we always have?

be given the opportunity to be heard. The provincial minister of

infrastructure must approve the closing before the second reading of

the bylaw. Any person who suffers damage from the road closing must be

compensated. If the parties can’t agree on compensation, the amount

will be determined by the Land Compensation Board. If the road is no

longer required because an alternate route is available, the

municipality can close the road by simple resolution, subject to the

approval of the infrastructure minister.

In Manitoba, ministerial permission is required. Notice of closure must

be given and a hearing held. The procedure is similar in Saskatchewan,

although in that province a strict reading of the legislation appears

to say the road can only be closed “for the purpose of leasing the part

for cultivation or grazing or both.”

In Saskatchewan, a municipality can also open a temporary road across

private land “where in the opinion of council, the condition of public

roads in the neighbourhood makes such action necessary or expedient.”

Such a road can only exist for two years.

What if there is a road across private land and it has not been

established by a municipality? In law, two landowners can agree that

one can have access to his land across the other’s land. Thus K can

agree that D can cross her land to get to his land. The agreement can

provide that anyone coming to see D can also use this route. This

agreement can be by a contract that applies only between K and D. The

contract can apply for a certain number of years or for as long as both

are owners of the land.

Alternatively, they can enter into an agreement to give all future

owners of D’s land the right to cross K’s land and bind future owners

of K’s land to provide such access. This is known as an easement. To be

binding, it must be registered in the land titles office.

In some provinces such as Manitoba and Ontario, an easement can arise

by the passage of time. If D has been crossing the land for 40 years,

an easement arises even though there is no formal agreement. This is

known as easement by prescription. Because of specific legislative

provisions, such easements by prescription cannot occur in

Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Don Purich is a former practising lawyer who is now involved in

publishing, teaching and writing about legal issues. His columns are

intended as general advice only. Individuals are encouraged to seek

other opinions and/or personal counsel when dealing with legal matters.

explore

Stories from our other publications