Your reading list

Collect carcass data to get top dollar, producers told

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 6, 2003

Fred Taylor has seen a lot of cattle, dead and alive, and has found they often don’t reveal the value of their meat until their carcasses are hanging on the rail.

The show judge and Alberta supervisor for the Canada Beef Grading Agency told leaders and senior members of Saskatchewan 4-H at a conference Oct. 26 that producers can gain an extra $100-$200 from each of their animals if they can guarantee the quality as expressed by fat cover and marbling in the meat.

The only way cattle producers can know they are producing the right type of animal is by asking for their carcass data.

Read Also

A man sits on the hub of a tire on a large piece of farm equipment with a laptop open and resting on his knees.

Communication key to bridging generation gap

Each generation is shaped by the predominant forces at play during their formative years. Acknowledging these influences can improve communication among the generations.

Few people collect it, which Taylor said is a shame, considering his agency charges only $5 per animal to check the data compared to $15 charged by U.S. packers.

He said purebred cattle producers should also be interested and get their commercial herd customers to trace the animals produced and let them know the data.

He said there is a trend in the U.S. for bulls “that don’t look like much going for $50,000-$60,000 because of carcass data.”

Taylor told 4-Hers that cattle producers of the future will change their herds through the cows they use.

“I’m a firm believer in that 65 percent of genetics come from the mother.

“When you see good fat on a carcass, you want to keep all the daughters of that cow.”

Taylor also told the 4-Hers they should limit the size of their animals to less than 800 pounds. Restaurants want smaller and consistent cuts of beef and will buy foreign meat if Canadians can’t produce what they want.

Since last fall, Taylor said he has noticed the quality of Canadian cows is slipping. There are fewer triple As and less marbling compared to 2002. The only consolation, he said, is that U.S. cows’ quality is even worse, likely because drought has caused producers to feed them less quality feed and more straw.

About the author

Diane Rogers

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications