No quick reform likely – Opinion

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 16, 2002

THE Parliament Hill political verdict on the Pest Management Regulatory

Agency is in and it is not flattering: the PMRA needs a political shake

up, better management and a more farmer-friendly attitude.

Government Liberal backbenchers agree, as illustrated by the Liberal

caucus task force on agriculture.

Opposition MPs agree, as illustrated by the all-party House of Commons

agriculture committee report unaccompanied by the usual opposition

minority dissent.

Farm groups and lobbyists agree in spades, as illustrated by the parade

Read Also

Grain is dumped from the bottom of a trailer at an inland terminal.

Worrisome drop in grain prices

Prices had been softening for most of the previous month, but heading into the Labour Day long weekend, the price drops were startling.

of farm and industry witnesses who have told various committees that

the PMRA is broken and needs fixing.

Chemical manufacturers say the agency is too slow and bureaucratic.

Farmers say it is too slow and makes little effort to ensure Canadian

farmers have the same chemical products their American competitors do.

Environmentalists say it has made too little progress in fast-tracking

introduction of less toxic products into the market.

Only PMRA brass seem to believe things are getting better and that the

agency is meeting goals and in some cases beating the United States in

speed of registrations and re-evaluations.

So surely, with that almost-unanimous outpouring of criticism from all

sides, Ottawa will respond quickly.

Think again.

PMRA reform is low on the Liberal political agenda and particularly the

agenda of the responsible minister, health minister Anne McLellan.

Don’t expect PMRA reform soon.

It would take a considerable commitment of political capital and

energy. It would take a considerable amount of political attention and

time allotment.

  • one of the above are likely to be available in the near future.

Here’s why.

McLellan, a relatively new health minister who has shown little natural

affinity for farm issues, has a plate full of controversial issues that

have a much higher profile for the Liberals than does reform of an

agency that is obscure to most Canadians not involved in the food or

chemical production business.

She has the constant battle of dealing with provinces over the

contentious issue of the Canada Health Act, health funding and the

autumn delivery of Roy Romanow’s report on reforming medicare. This is

McLellan’s top priority and one of the government’s key issues as it

looks to re-election.

She introduced legislation May 9 on regulation of new technologies in

reproduction. As an issue loaded with the symbolism of right-to-life

debates of old, this will be highly contentious and time consuming.

Since April, she has had new pesticides regulation legislation before

the House of Commons and with its resonance both in urban and rural

Canada, it is a topic that commands her attention.

Add to that two other points:

  • Despite the fact that she was raised on a farm and has a

dairy-farming sister in Nova Scotia, Edmonton lawyer and law professor

McLellan seems uncomfortable dealing with the detail of

farmer-sensitive issues.

  • The parliamentary session is expected to end this summer to allow the

Queen to open a new session with a Throne Speech in the fall. Hold-over

issues will take a back seat to Liberal dreams of what hot button

issues must be pressed to win a fourth consecutive term.

PMRA reform doesn’t sound like one of them.

About the author

Barry Wilson

Barry Wilson is a former Ottawa correspondent for The Western Producer.

explore

Stories from our other publications